No. The right to a 'speedy trial' only exists for your initial trial. There are no such 'rights' attached to subsequent appeals and judicial porcesses.
Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)
It should be 50 days between the arrest and the beginning of a trial.
The short answer is: Yes, Legally, a "speedy trial" is a trial that is within the specified time-frame, set by law, referred to as the "statute of limitations". As long as the trial has occurred within that time-frame, the defendant has been given a "Fair and Speedy Trial", as required by the 6th and 14th Amendments of the U.S Constitution. Any further specification of "speedy" is an opinion, and has no legal standing.
No. The decisions of the Texas Supreme Court are binding on trial courts in Texas. That is why it is called the Supreme Court.
"Speedy Trial" is a law enforcement/court slang phrase referring to the constitutional guarantee right of a speedy trial and refers to the 90 day period from indictment or charge to the start of the actual trial. The right to a "speedy" trial may be waived by defense counsel (usually requested in order to prepare for the trial presentation).
90 days, unless waived by the defendant or his attorney.
yes
The constitution guarantees a speedy and public trial but this is not an absolute. Events outside the court's control like natural disasters, security concerns or the unavailability of a witness may limit the right to a speedy and public trial.
The matter of speedy trial should have been addressed at either your preliminary hearing or your bail hearing. When so-called "speedy" trial is requested, the trial should normally begin within a 90 day timeframe.
There were 3 trials in all. 1st trial - went to the Alabama Supreme Court and then the USA Supreme Court 2nd trial - went straight to the USA Supreme Court 3rd trial - final trial with results
Depending on the circumstances of your particular situation the "speedy' time can vary significantly. See below link: i
In a case before the Supreme Court, the law itself is on trial and the justices determine whether the law is guilty of violating the Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land.