How would find out if my lawyer received a check from EEOC my case was settled 12/6/2013
It would be a rare employer that does not have rules against it. However, as a contractor, you can independently state your hours and how you do your work.
As long as it is not against your employment contract, it is possible. You do not have to continue working there either.
No. An employer isn't supposed to discriminate against any one for any reason. However, you might be encountering employment rules about members of the same family working for the same company or, more usually the case, one working in a supervisory capacity for the other. The latter is usually not allowed. The former depends on the company.
The thing which disappoint while working for an emloyer is poor attitude of employer.
If you have a job, your current employer is who you are now working for. If you do not HAVE a job, you have no current employer.
if you get fired can an employer withhold your retirement after working for them for 30 years
If you have a job, your current employer is who you are now working for. If you do not HAVE a job, you have no current employer.
I am currently off on sick and my employer is proposing different working times. do i have to reply, or accept this proposal
Prospective means: 1. of or in the future: prospective earnings. 2. potential, likely, or expected: a prospective partner. A prospective employer is an employer for whom you might work in the future or have a possibility of working (for example, an employer to whom you have applied for work or for whom you would like to work), but you are not yet working.
No. The only time any information about your new employer would be relevant to your old employer would be if your employment with the new employer violated a contract (eg covenant not to compete) you signed with the old employer.
I see several answers that are not exactly true. Those answers say, there is no statutory limitation on collection of child support. If the accrual of child support ensued before the enactment of the Bradley Amendment, then there was a statute of limitations. the Bradley Amendment wiped out state's statute of limitations and pays cse agencies to collect child support. the more they collect, the more they receive from the federal government. The CSE agencies are generally corrupt and not impartial; their power should be challenged because of their bias. So, in a case that I am working on, some 50 years after a divorce, CSE filed a lien in an amount of $105k+, which was totally bogus, but if one submits themselves to their jurisdiction, the courts rubber stamp whatever they do. However, the Bradley Amendment runs afoul of the constitution when it tries to wipe out a statute of limitation that has already ran. Today, there is no limitation due to the Bradley Amendment, but in erstwhile years, the statute may bar collection of some, or all of past due child support, depending on the year of the divorce.
The employer.