answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

There is no extra-biblical evidence for the ten plagues of Egypt. These plagues would surely have caused great economic and social stress, yet there is no archaeological evidence for this, and Egypt continued on at the height of its economic and military power for several centuries. The ancient Egyptian texts do not mention the supposed plagues, even indirectly. Alpologists would claim that the Egyptians would choose not to record anything negative abouth the kingdom, but much of the writing that has come down to us consists of commercial transactions, correspondence and trivia about life in Egypt. The plagues should at least be reflected in this minutiae, yet life went on blissfully.

  • Answer 2
The Ipuwer papyrus describes Egypt's experiencing the Plagues: "Pestilence is throughout the land....the river is blood, death is not scarce...there is no food...neither fruit nor herbs can be found...barley has perished...all is ruin...the statues are burned" (Professor John van Seters, Journal of Egyptian Archaeology no. 50).
The plagues were also described by ancient historians, including Herodotus and Diodorus. The Exodus is mentioned by Strabo, Berosus, Artapanus, Numenius, Justin, and Tacitus.
But in any case, few nations are content to record embarrassing setbacks honestly. Even today, British and American textbooks describe the American Revolution in very different ways.
An example of the above principle:
The destruction of Sennacherib's army at the walls of Jerusalem was denied by secular theorists, because the Assyrians made no mention of it. But then it was found that Berosus and Herodotus both state that Sennacherib's military campaign in Judea ended in plague and defeat. It should not surprise us that the Assyrians themselves didn't record their own losses.
It is only the Hebrew Bible, because of its Divine origin, that exposes the faults of its own people and even magnifies them.
In no other religious text can one find such openness. None of the Israelites were immune to strong criticism: Abraham (Genesis 16:5), Reuben (Gen.ch.35), Simeon and Levi (Gen.ch.34 and 49), Judah (Gen.ch.38), Joseph's brothers (Gen.ch.37), Moses (Numbers ch.20), Aaron (Exodus 32:2-4), Samson (Judges 14:1-3), Eli's sons (1 Samuel 2:12), Samuel's sons (1 Samuel 8:1-3), Saul (1 Samuel ch.15), David (2 Samuel ch.11-12), Solomon (1 Kings ch.11), and many others.
User Avatar

Wiki User

6y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

6y ago

The Ipuwer papyrus describes Egypt's experiencing the Plagues: "Pestilence is throughout the land....the river is blood, death is not scarce...there is no food...neither fruit nor herbs can be found...barley has perished...all is ruin...the statues are burned" (Professor John van Seters, Journal of Egyptian Archaeology no. 50).

The plagues were also described by ancient historians, including Herodotus and Diodorus. The Exodus is mentioned by Strabo, Berosus, Artapanus, Numenius, Justin, and Tacitus.

But in any case, few nations are content to record embarrassing setbacks honestly. Even today, British and American textbooks describe the American Revolution in very different ways.


An example of the above principle:

The destruction of Sennacherib's army at the walls of Jerusalem was denied by secular theorists, because the Assyrians made no mention of it. But then it was found that Berosus and Herodotus both state that Sennacherib's military campaign in Judea ended in plague and defeat. It should not surprise us that the Assyrians themselves didn't record their own losses.


It is only the Hebrew Bible, because of its Divine origin, that exposes the faults of its own people and even magnifies them.

In no other religious text can one find such openness. None of the Israelites were immune to strong criticism: Abraham (Genesis 16:5), Reuben (Gen.ch.35), Simeon and Levi (Gen.ch.34 and 49), Judah (Gen.ch.38), Joseph's brothers (Gen.ch.37), Moses (Numbers ch.20), Aaron (Exodus 32:2-4), Samson (Judges 14:1-3), Eli's sons (1 Samuel 2:12), Samuel's sons (1 Samuel 8:1-3), Saul (1 Samuel ch.15), David (2 Samuel ch.11-12), Solomon (1 Kings ch.11), and many others.

See also the Related Links.

Link: Is the Hebrew Bible accurate?

Link: Moses was a real person

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Is there any historical evidence outside the Bible for the Ten Plagues of Egypt?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about General History

Where was the Queen of Sheba buried?

There is no evidence outside the Bible that the Queen of Sheba ever lived. And if she was not a real historical person, we can only look in the Bible for the answer. The Bible story does not say where the Queen of Sheba was buried.


Were the Hebrew slaves in Ancient Egypt aloud a temple to their God?

There is no evidence that the Hebrews were ever in Egypt, let alone slaves, outside of the Bible.


What are the 10 jewish plagues?

The Plagues of Egypt were sent by God to Egypt to try and convince Pharaoh to set the Jews free from slavery.They were:The plagues as they appear in the Bible are:Water, which turned to blood and killed all fish and other aquatic lifeFrogsLiceFlies or wild animalsDisease on livestockUnhealable boilsHail and thunderLocustsDarknessDeath of the first-born of all Egyptian humans and animals.To be saved, the Israelites had to place the blood of a lamb on their door.This story can be found in the bible, in the book of Exodus or for an alternative it is fairly accurately represented in the Dreamworks film 'The Prince of Egypt'Hope this helps!


Is Macedonia near Philippi in the Bible?

Yes Philppi in the bible was a city in historical Macedonia in northern Greee Acts 16 vs 12


Is there any record of Moses in Egyptian history?

In Fact..... "NO".. By the traditional chronology of Egyptian history the 18th dynasty ruled from about 1550 to 1320 BCE. According to Bible chronology the Exodus occurred about 1446 BCE. But there is no evidence from 18th dynasty Egyptian records of a major disaster such as would have resulted from the 10 devastating plagues that fell on Egypt, or of the destruction of the Egyptian army during this period.

Related questions

Where was the Queen of Sheba buried?

There is no evidence outside the Bible that the Queen of Sheba ever lived. And if she was not a real historical person, we can only look in the Bible for the answer. The Bible story does not say where the Queen of Sheba was buried.


Was the united monarchy of David and Solomon which is described by the Bible as a regional power historically correct?

No. there are no historical record or archaeological evidence outside the Bible that the alleged United Empire of King David and King Solomon were a force to recon with.


Is there evidence outside the Bible that proves Matthew was a historical person?

In the early first century, Matthew was never mentioned by anyone outside the gospels, and the gospel that bears his name was written anonymously and only attributed to Matthew later in the second century. So, the existence of the gospel is not evidence for the historicity of Matthew and there is no other extra-biblical evidence for him.


Is the bible the only historical document that tells us about jesus?

The Bible is more than a historical document. It is the very Word of God, and as such, what need have we of further evidence and stories of Jesus?


Is there any evidence outside the Bible that Jesus ascended to heaven?

There is no extra-biblical evidence that Jesus ascended to heaven.


Where in The Bible are the plagues?

Exodus 7-11


Are there evidences outside the Bible that Mark was a historical person?

In the early first century, Mark was never mentioned by anyone outside the gospels, and the gospel that bears his name was written anonymously and only attributed to Mark later in the second century. So, the existence of the gospel is not evidence for the historicity of Mark and there is no other extra-biblical evidence for him.


Who did the plagues in the bible affect?

It affected everybody in Egypt.


Is there evidence outside the Bible of anything described in the Bible?

Yes, there is evidence for some things and some events described in the Bible, but no evidence for many other things and events. There is no evidence for the creation stories, Noahs Flood, Abraham, Isaac or Jacob, nor of the Exodus from Egypt or the military conquest of Canaan. There is no evidence outside the Bible for the United Monarchy of Saul, David and Solomon, but there may be circumstantial evidence that David once lived, or at least that the people believed he once had. There is no evidence for prophets like Elijah and Elisha, but there is evidence for the northern kingdom of Israel and the southern kingdom of Judah. There is evidence for the Babylonian Exile and the Return to Jerusalem under Persian rule. There is no evidence that the Books of Daniel and Esther were more than novelistic fiction. There is no evidence outside the Bible for any of the miracles performed by Jesus, or even his crucifixion and resurrection. In fact, there is no real evidence that Jesus of Nazareth even existed, although he may well have done so.


What book of the bible did Thaddeus write?

Biblical tradition lists Thaddeus as one of the seventy apostles of Christ. There is no historical evidence that he wrote any of the books in the KJV bible.


Is the Torah a historical document?

A:There is no evidence that the Ten Commandments ever existed outside the Bible. In fact, the strong consensus of biblical scholars is that there never was an Exodus from Egypt as described in the Bible, in which case the story of Moses receiving the Ten Commandments from God can not be historical. The Ten Commandments belong to traditions put down in writing during the middle centuries of the first millennium BCE.


Are there evidences outside the Bible that John the author of the fourth Gospel was a historical person?

The fourth gospel was written anonymously and attributed to the disciple John, later in the second century, on the grounds that the "disciple whom Jesus loved" seemed to refer to John and the Church Fathers believed the author may have been referring to himself when saying "disciple whom Jesus loved". Outside the Bible, there is no evidence that the disciple John was a historical person, and we do not know who the author of John's Gospel really was.