There is proof of electromagnetic surges, temperature fluxuations, unexplained visual and audio occurances, photographic anomalies and thousands of eyewitnesses over thousands of years. So it is left up to the individual what he/she believes.
Short is no. Long requires both a definition for 'proof' and a discussion of naturalistic methodology. Proof in a scientific sense can only be attained in mathematical relationships (such as F=ma), it cannot be attained in proving something's existence. In a colloquial sense virtually anything can be 'proven' scientifically as long as there is no reasonable doubt for not existing. Science only can address things which can be measured and observed in the natural environment or in experiments. Ghosts and all other supernatural phenomenon can not be observed in this way because they are not part of the natural world, something that does not exist in the natural world cannot be measured or observed and therefore science cannot make any conclusions about their existence. So science cannot disprove the existence of ghosts, but it also hasn't found any evidence for their existence. No I know that there isn't, because I've searched everywhere, and I didn't find anything. Furthermore, seeing is believing, and I've never seen a ghost or heard ghost voices, although others "claim" to have seen or heard. HERE'S SOME PROVE GO ON youtube.com then type in real ghost videos click on the first video its real
Ghosts are not actually the subject of scientific inquiry, although some "ghost-hunters" like to pretend that they are. There are a number of synonyms for ghost, such as a phantom, specter, haunt, etc., but none of these is any more scientific than ghost.
The noun 'ghost' is a concrete noun as a character in a story, movie, or play. The noun 'ghost' is an abstract noun as a word for something that can't be experienced by any of the five physical senses; a word for a concept.
Well, any of them could be wearing a red sweater, so not necessarily. If it's a blood-stained sweater, I'd be worried, but otherwise I wouldn't worry too much. (Unless, of course, there is suspicious behavior involved.) A ghost with a red sweater. Hm, I wouldn't say bad ghost there really isn't any such thing as a bad ghost. The ones to look out for is demons, and if that's what you see, stay away from it and pray. P.S. A Black Man wrote this____________________ Please think about this carefully. If it is a ghost, it has no human body, so how could it be wearing anything?
Yes. Antiparticles are regularly produced and observed in particle accelerators.
winx club
Depends who you ask. To me and other Heathens, Asatruar, and the Theodish, they would say yes. Just like any other God, is there any hard scientific evidence for his existence? No. Is lack of proof of existence proof of lack of existence? Again, No.
The teachings of the Buddha are the most evident proof for his existence.
there is no actual proof that there are any yetis in existence.
It depends on if you have the gift to see ghosts.
Some people believe that ghosts are real. There does not seem to be any real scientific evidence or proof of the existence of ghosts, but there is also no evidence that they do not exist.
No
no but there is no proof that they aren't
There is no scientific proof of ghosts or demons. I won't rule out the possibility that Podunk University Of The One True Faith And Sciences Such As Long Division or some such might have claimed to find some, but there isn't any legitimate proof.
Just as there is no evidence for the existence of God, so there is no evidence for the existence of the Holy Ghost. It is a matter of faith, and faith alone.
Short is no. Long requires both a definition for 'proof' and a discussion of naturalistic methodology. Proof in a scientific sense can only be attained in mathematical relationships (such as F=ma), it cannot be attained in proving something's existence. In a colloquial sense virtually anything can be 'proven' scientifically as long as there is no reasonable doubt for not existing. Science only can address things which can be measured and observed in the natural environment or in experiments. Ghosts and all other supernatural phenomenon can not be observed in this way because they are not part of the natural world, something that does not exist in the natural world cannot be measured or observed and therefore science cannot make any conclusions about their existence. So science cannot disprove the existence of ghosts, but it also hasn't found any evidence for their existence. No I know that there isn't, because I've searched everywhere, and I didn't find anything. Furthermore, seeing is believing, and I've never seen a ghost or heard ghost voices, although others "claim" to have seen or heard. HERE'S SOME PROVE GO ON youtube.com then type in real ghost videos click on the first video its real
No, but science is just a way of quantifying and structuring information in a useful format. So, just because there is no scientific proof, does not mean that it does not exist. In fact, science contradicts itself, by simultaneously proving that there both is and isn't a god. Hope this helps!