No, since they never existed in the classical sense. however, there is evidence that the ancient people might have been looking at the skulls of ancient elephant-type mammals, with their large central nasal hole, and imagine a giant creature with a single eye in the middle of its head.
There is not a scientific name for a Cyclops. This is because a Cyclops is a fictional creature so it isn't able to be classified.
Scientific conclusions are based on scientific evidence.
use scientific evidence to support your answer
Scientific evidence is facts or evidence that is used to prove or disprove a scientific theory. Scientific evidence appeal is when new finding or statistics are brought to light that disprove some or all of the previous evidence's findings.
Ancedotally normally refers to evidence that is based on less scientific evidence but evidence that appears to back up the stronger scientific evidence. It adds weight to scientific evidence but is not necessarily proven.
There is no scientific evidence. Those who believe in ghosts will put forward non-scientific evidence.
No. No evidence in the scientific area. Many paranormal occurrences but no scientific evidence.
Scientific evidence appeal is some form of proof which supports or counters a scientific theory. This is the information that will be used as empirical evidence of a hypothesis.
No. It is not.
when the evidence is relatable
scientific facts/evidence superstitions about comets and astroids
Scientific laws are based on scientific experiments, scientific conclusions after exhaustive tests, and they are also based on formerly scientific discoveries and experiments. Scientific evidence without a conclusive proof may be a false evidence. Scientific evidence doesn't exist. Science is not based on evidences, but on real results originated from a theory. Results are solid, palpable, real and cannot be doubted.