The word 'inhibit' is not used correctly. It is difficult to know what was actually hard for the angry boy since the incorrect verb (inhibit) is blurring what the sentence is trying to say. Some alternates (guesses):
It was hard for the angry boy to stop punching the bully.
It was hard for the angry boy to refrain from punching the bully.
It was hard for the angry boy to engage in punching the bully.
The proper English is "I am angry with you" or "I am angry at you.""In you" means that something is inside of you, not that the person is angry at them.
Example sentence - She was angry at herself for losing her temper.
How angry Hera gets! This is an exclamatory sentence.
Not. "Are you angry to me?" would be correct.
ms.gomez got angry with the gardener
Exclamation.
An alligator is angry.
Snow leopards only become angry when it is time to fight. So the answer would be fight by punching it in the head really hard and throwing your items at its nose; even is it means throwing your money!
Here is an example sentence with the word 'angry':I sensed that Samuel was angry when he clenched his fist and gritted his fist in frustration.
No. It should be "Are you angry with me?"
depends if there already angry or not like if you told them something that would upset them then you would say don't be angry
depends if there already angry or not like if you told them something that would upset them then you would say don't be angry