Yes. A grammatically correct sentence (to begin with) has to have a subject (int this case, hand) and a verb (is). The sentence does need to be capitalized and punctuated correctly though...
Yes, the sentence "his hand is filthy" is grammatically correct.
The correct way to write the sentence is: "Give me your hand," she said.
No, only certain verbs. For instance, "I live in France" does not have any direct objects because the verb "live" can't take any. "Get"', on the other hand, is a transitive verb = it can (and in English it MUST) take a direct object, that's why we use a "dummy" IT in the sentence: "Do you get IT?".
"On one hand" is correct. It is commonly used at the beginning of a sentence to introduce one side or perspective of an argument or situation.
The correct answer is: D. Linda hand me the sealed envelope. (Subject) Linda (Verb) hand (Object) me (Direct object) the sealed envelope.
The sentence "There are, on the other hand, many reasons to push this project forward." is correct with the comma inserted after "are" and before "on the other hand" to set off the introductory phrase.
This sentence is not written in correct grammar. It should say I ordered dark chocolate instead of My ordered. You could also use a comma with the conjunction "but". "I ordered dark chocolate, but is was not yet in my hand."
"Can't wait to have all this stuff on hand" can be correct or wrong depending on the context. "Cant" needs an apostrophe as it is a contraction.
The correct way to write the sentence is: "Give me your hand," she said.
tendering a helping hand is this a correct sentence?
No, only certain verbs. For instance, "I live in France" does not have any direct objects because the verb "live" can't take any. "Get"', on the other hand, is a transitive verb = it can (and in English it MUST) take a direct object, that's why we use a "dummy" IT in the sentence: "Do you get IT?".
"On one hand" is correct. It is commonly used at the beginning of a sentence to introduce one side or perspective of an argument or situation.
There are no quotation marks in that sentence unless you state who's saying it. "Give me your hand", said Mary, would be correct.
You do not necessarily have to include "writ of" in a sentence. Here is an example of this term's use, taken from the American Library Association website (address follows the quote): "On Monday, October 29, 2001, the U.S. Supreme Court denied certiorari." On the other hand, "writ of" is often technically and grammatically correct, as in: "The defendant's attorney filed a petition for a writ of certiorari."
The sentence "There are, on the other hand, many reasons to push this project forward." is correct with the comma inserted after "are" and before "on the other hand" to set off the introductory phrase.
Yes, had and had are correct. You could drop the first 'hand' and still have a good sentence. BUT who is "They"? and who is "her"? That makes the sentence confusing. You could change it to: Cathy's parents had just arrived, but her husband had been staying nearby for a while.
Sure. With is a word that doesnt always feature at the beginning of a sentence but I guess you can frame a few sentences with it. 1. With whom would you like to have dinner? 2. With what would you break this big piece of rock? 3. With a million dollars, do you think I can own a Ferrari? The point is that, these sentences might sound better if they dont begin with "With". 1. Who would like to have dinner with? 2. What would you use to break this rock? 3. Do you think I can own a Ferrari with a million dollars? Though the first set of sentences are grammatically correct, they look and sound better if they did not start with "With"
A sentence for "to dress in hand-me-downs" : My mother was frugal that she had to dress me in hand-me-downs.