0
No, objective truth is not relative. If someone claims this, it is not truth. Subjective matters are not truth because unregenerate autonomy is subject to arbitrary scrutiny, and is not confirmed by empirical means. Conventions and consensuses are not truth either, this is proven when the universality of abstract entities are appealed to. For example utilitarianism appeals to the greatest good for the many, and is not truth, because pragmatism doesn't the concerns raised by metaphysics. Only the Christian worldview and its proclamation to the foundations of truth is to the impossibility of the contrary. No other worldview can account for abstract entities, and their universal application and invariant character. 2 Corinthians 13:8 "For we can do nothing against the truth, but for the truth."
Wiki User
∙ 8y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Did Protagoras invent the Socratic Method?
No, Protagoras did not invent the Socratic Method. He was a prominent Sophist who focused on teaching persuasive speaking skills. The Socratic Method is associated with Socrates, who used a question-and-answer approach to stimulate critical thinking and dialogue.
How was Socrates similar to the Sophists?
Socrates and the Sophists were both ancient Greek philosophers who focused on ethics and the art of rhetoric. However, they differed in their approach - while the Sophists believed that truth was relative and could be manipulated through persuasive speech, Socrates sought objective truth through dialogue and critical thinking.
Would Socrates Plato Aristotle and Aquinas concur that all moral and political truth is relative to ones time and place?
Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, and Aquinas would likely disagree that all moral and political truth is relative to one's time and place. They believed in objective standards of morality and sought to uncover universal truths that are applicable across different contexts and time periods. They emphasized the importance of reason and virtue in determining moral and political principles.
What did sophists believe?
Sophists believed that truth and morality are relative concepts that vary based on individual perspectives and circumstances. They emphasized the importance of persuasive arguments and rhetoric in communication and debate.
How did socrates' view of the good truth and the just disagree with that of the sophists?
Socrates believed in absolute truth and objective morality, seeing them as universal and unchanging concepts. In contrast, the Sophists believed that truth and morality were subjective and relative to individuals or societies, leading to the belief that these concepts could be manipulated or changed to suit personal gain or persuasion. Socrates argued for the pursuit of knowledge and virtue as essential to understanding the good and the just, while the Sophists emphasized persuasion and the ability to argue different viewpoints regardless of their truthfulness.
Is truth relative If so is not that statement absolute?
The comment or assertion 'all truth is relative' is self-defeating in several ways which are similar although stated a little differently. If truth is relative then the statement that truth is relative cannot itself be absolute and therefore true objectively. Also, as correctly suggested in the question 'truth is relative' is itself a self-contradictory absolute statement which cannot be true if truth is indeed relative.
Is truth absolute or relative?
Here's some food for thought.When you say, "Truth is not absolute; it is relative," is that an absolute statement?Please think about that. If you do, you will have the answer to your question.
What is the real truth?
The real truth is this, ABSOLUTE TRUTH. Relative truth (or the truth that the non-believers have) is not truth, they don't have truth until they accept Jesus Christ! The giver of Absolute truth, because Jesus is that true truth!
What are the two truths of reality in Buddhism?
In Mahayana Buddhism, a distinction is made between relative truth and absolute truth.
What is historical truth?
Things as they really were. Truth is eternal and unchangable. It is a recent philosophy that theorizes that truth is relative. It is not. Consider your being born. The birth event is historical - at least for you and yours.
Who were the relative of Sojourner Truth?
Sojouner Truth did got to knoe her relatives at all because since she was born in slavery they were all quick sold .
Who do transcendentalists define truth?
How Do Transcendentalists Define Truth answer 2. How a transcendentalist define truth will come to know only when you become so. But in Buddhism a transcendentalist will define a set of relative truths as per our capacity and then keep on rising the quality of that relative truth as we grow in to that path. One day suddenly you will come to know the real truth. Truth is importantly a feeling or experience which is tough to reach. Though truth is visible everyday and every time in the physical aspects , but it helps only when it is seen by the inner most reality of our existence.
Is truth an absolute?
TRUTH is defined as something being based on FACT.Since FACT is an absolute thenTRUTH is an absolute. Below is an interesting discussion between two great philosophers, Socrates and Protagoras.IS TRUTH RELATIVE?(A dialogue between Socrates and Protagoras)Protagoras: Truth is relative. It is only a matter of opinion.Socrates: You mean that truth is mere subjective opinion?Protagoras: Exactly. What is true for you is true for you, and what is true for me, is true for me. Truth is subjective.Socrates: Do you really mean that? That my opinion is true by virtue of its being my opinion?Protagoras: Indeed I do.Socrates: My opinion is: Truth is absolute, not opinion, and that you, Mr. Protagoras, are absolutely in error. Since this is my opinion, then you must grant that it is true according to your philosophy.Protagoras: You are quite correct, Socrates.
Is one form of Buddhism better than another?
I think that even Buddhists will say that truth is relative, and you have to find the path that works best for you.
Why is the distinction between validity and soundness relative for us as learners of logic?
Valid = fact from truth problem truth can lie if I was hot I'm god I'm hot thus I'm god Sound is just all factual
How is jainism dualistic?
Jainism is not dualistic, it is more of multiplicity region i.e. anekantwad... One can say somewhat close to Einstein`s theory of relativity - truth is relative.
Is logic truth?
logic is common sense. it's a method of thinking that's embedded into the mind of human beings. it's something like our conscience, therefore it's relative. it can be improved and can be led to compromise. it can be disregarded and ignored(such as when people are in love.) and it can be moved by emotions. the truth should be absolute, and should be constant, it should be timeless and immovable. which logic isn't so it is not the truth.
