The Dred Scott v. Sandford decision in 1857 established that territorial voters did not have the authority to ban or allow slavery; this decision held that Congress was the sole authority on the issue of slavery in the territories.
The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 allowed the residents of those territories to determine through popular sovereignty whether they would allow slavery. This led to violent conflicts and the "Bleeding Kansas" period as pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions fought for control. Ultimately, the outcome of these conflicts influenced the larger debate over slavery leading up to the Civil War.
The settlers in the new Northeast territory believed that banning slavery was important to align with their ideals of freedom and equality. They saw slavery as a violation of human rights and believed that a society built on slavery was morally wrong. Additionally, they wanted to establish a society that valued hard work, merit, and individual liberty.
Both pro-slavery and anti-slavery advocates wanted control of Kansas territory because its status as a potential new state could tip the balance in Congress in favor of their respective causes. Controlling Kansas would allow them to influence whether it entered the Union as a free or slave state, impacting the overall political power dynamics in the nation.
Abolitionists wanted the immediate emancipation of all enslaved individuals and the end of slavery as an institution. They also sought equal rights and treatment for freed slaves in society.
There were individuals who believed that restricting the expansion of slavery into new territories would help contain its influence and eventually lead to its decline. This sentiment was part of the broader anti-slavery movement that emerged in the United States during the 19th century.
freeport doctrine
Under popular sovereignty, decisions about slavery would be made by the settlers in a territory. There were different viewpoints about when the decision should be made; some felt the decision shouldn't be decided until a territory was approaching statehood, while others wanted it to be decided earlier.
Settlers in the territory wanted the same approach to slavery as in the states they came from.
utah and mexico
He wanted to reinstate slavery there in an effort to make it profitable.
slavery
Settlers in the territory wanted the same approach to slavery as in the states they came from.
I think because they wanted more territory and land??? and they wanted to own ohio..
Popular Sovereignty
well the leader of the group, abbe decided to fight for what she wanted so she did and got her way
Settlers in the territory wanted the same approach to slavery as in the states they came from.
In 1837 Lincoln took his first public stand on slavery when the Illinois legislature voted to condemn the activities of the abolition societies that wanted an immediate end to slavery by any means.