Wind power can be quite costly over time, but nuclear power creates wastes that cost a lot of money to dispose of, let alone getting the nuclear rods in the first place. However, nuclear power can provide much more power than wind power, so they are more or less equals.
The actual cost of producing the energy is less with nuclear, but it has a lot of investment and potential disposal costs as well.
extracting energy from nuclear fuels is more expensive than extracting energy from fossil fuels
yes
Expensive to build, cheaper to run than using fossil fuels once it is built.
Building a nuclear plant is expensive because of the very high quality engineering involved and the complicated safety systems. However once built the fuel costs are less than for coal or natural gas.
Extracting energy from nuclear fuels is more expensive than extracting energy from fossil fuels.
Nuclear fusion produce energy 400 times more than nuclear fission for the same mass.
because itv cost more because it a renewable resource.
extracting energy from nuclear fuels is more expensive than extracting energy from fossil fuels
More expensive to instal, cheaper to run
Nuclear is about the same as fossil fuel in total costs, but more expensive to build the plant. Solar and wind power are more expensive and have to be subsidised to make them economic for power companies to use
A part of mass is transformed in energy.
No. It produces less.