0
It has been stated that intelligence tests are reliable but not valid?
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Do your PSYCH 202 home work without looking here! The assignment is due Sunday, answer it for yourself!
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
This assertion suggests that intelligence tests consistently measure the same trait (reliability), but may not accurately measure what they intend to (validity). In other words, while the results may be consistent, they may not necessarily reflect the true level of intelligence of an individual.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
A test may be reliable but not necessarily validIs it possible for a test to be valid but not reliable?
No, for a test to be valid, it must also be reliable. Reliability refers to the consistency of the test results, while validity refers to the accuracy of the test in measuring what it is supposed to measure. A test cannot be valid if it is not reliable.
What is the difference between a valid test and a reliable test?
Reliable indicates that each time the experiment is conducted, the same results are obtained (accuracy). Valid indicates the experiment (or test) has controlled variables and used an appropriate method/model.
Give an example of how a test may be reliable but not valid?
A bathroom scale that consistently shows your weight as 10 pounds less than your actual weight, but always produces the same result when you step on it multiple times, can be considered reliable (consistent) but not valid (accurate).
Why research should be valid and reliable?
Valid and reliable research ensures that the findings are accurate and trustworthy. Validity ensures that the study measures what it intends to measure, while reliability ensures that the results can be replicated and are consistent over time. Valid and reliable research is essential for building knowledge, making informed decisions, and driving future research.
Is validity is a prerequisite of reliability?
No, validity is not a prerequisite of reliability. Reliability refers to the consistency or stability of a measure, while validity refers to the accuracy of the measure in assessing what it is intended to assess. A measure can be reliable but not valid, meaning it consistently measures something but not necessarily what it is intended to measure.
What relation do IQ tests have to intelligence?
The only thing IQ scores are a valid measure of is one's ability to score high on IQ tests. There are many kinds of intelligence.
Why is it possible to have a reliable measure that is not valid but impossible to have a valid measure that is not reliable?
A test can be reliable and not valid. A test cannot be valid and not reliable.
Is a reliable test necessarily valid?
In my view reliable test is always valid.
Is it possible for an operational definition to be valid but not reliable?
Is it possible for an operational definition to be valid but not reliable
Is there a valid online intelligence test?
No
A test may be reliable but not necessarily validIs it possible for a test to be valid but not reliable?
No, for a test to be valid, it must also be reliable. Reliability refers to the consistency of the test results, while validity refers to the accuracy of the test in measuring what it is supposed to measure. A test cannot be valid if it is not reliable.
Can a test be reliable and yet not valid?
A test may be reliable yet not valid, The results can end up being reliable, in other words certain to have yielded properly based on input. But the results may not be trustworthy.
What are the tests for valid Government interference to freedom of expression?
...
Sampling techniques can provide statistically reliable and valid survey results except?
Sampling techniques can provide statistically reliable and valid survey results except haphazard sampling.
What is the difference between slection crieteria and validity and reliability?
Social and Medical sciences uses these statistical concepts. ideally, we have to measure the same way each time, but intrasubject, interobserver and intraobserver variance occur, so we have to anticipate and evaluate them. In short, it is the repeatability of a measurement, by you, myself and everybody person or instrument. Validity is how much the mean measure that we got is near of the true answer or value. So, an instrument can be reliable but not valid, valid but not reliable, both valid and reliable, nor valid neither reliable. I suggest that you imagine a target: you can aim and 1) always get the center (both valid and reliable) 2) always get the same distant point (reliable but not valid) 3) err much around the true center (valid but not reliable - the mean and median of your arrow's shot will get the center) 4) err much around the another center, false one (nor valid neither reliable) I did not understood exactly what selection criteria have to do with the rest of question, so, left in blank ;-)
Give an example of how a test may be reliable but not valid?
A bathroom scale that consistently shows your weight as 10 pounds less than your actual weight, but always produces the same result when you step on it multiple times, can be considered reliable (consistent) but not valid (accurate).
Is an IQ Test a valid measure of intelligence?
No. But it's good for bragging rights.
