No, Humanist developed in Italy during the Renaissance, and the Italians tried to recover ancient classical civilization, starting around 1350. Northern Humanism found Italian humanism too pagan, and northern humanism crossed into heresy and criticizing the Church.
.
from History of the Catholic Church from the Apostolic Age to the Third Millennium, by James Hitchcock, Imprimatur: The Most Reverend Edward Rice, © 2012 by Ignatius Press, San Francisco
Since the Enlightenment, secularist had accused the Church of being anti-humanist, because She subordinated man to God. But by the beginning of the twenty-first century, it had become apparent that without God the dignity of man could no longer be affirmed, that many secularist had come to reject humanism precisely because it placed man at the summit of nature. Thus, ironically, the Catholic Church, as She had since the time of Her birth, claimed to be both the representative of God and the chief witness to true Humanism.
The Huguenots were the French protestants. The Jesuits were formed primarily to combat the protestant heresy. I don't know where you got this idea, but some of the stuff on the web for Huguenots and Jesuits suggest that the two were bitter enemies, and that the Huguenots were responsible in some way for the suppression of the Jesuits. Either way, there is no way that the Jesuits ever combined Catholic beliefs with protestant beliefs - that would give a lie to their whole reason for existing.
The Jesuits are completely Catholic, they were founded by St. Ignatius Loyola and approved by Pope Paul III in 1540. Their spirituality grew out of the Spiritual Exercises of St. Ignatius and its structure and discipline were embodied in the detailed Constitution that St. Ignatius composed. Everything in the Jesuits was founded on Catholic beliefs, it was not combined with anything outside the Catholic faith. St. Ignatius spiritual exercises and his Constitutions were composed entirely from a Catholic framework.
Roman Catholic AnswerGreat Heavens, no. One of the reasons the Jesuits were formed was to deal with the protestant heresy and try to bring the people back to the church. Calvanist beliefs are a far remove from Christian beliefs, and the Calvanists were some of the people the Jesuits were trying to save.
There is no such thing as a Jesuit or Dominican Catholic. They are all Catholics. A man who discerns a vocation to the Society of Jesus, started by St. Ignatius would become a Jesuit, he remains a Catholic. Likewise, a man (or woman) who discerns a vocation to the Dominicans would become a Dominican Friar (or Sister) but remain a Catholic. Jesuits and Dominicans are two religious Orders within the Church. Jesuits have two main vocations: to teach and to preach the faith to non-Catholics. Originally, the Order was founded to fight the protestant heresy. The Domicans were founded as an Order of Preachers, they were originally founded to fight the Arian heresy. Needless to say, the Dominicans have been a little bit more successful than the Jesuits, when was the last time you ran into an Arian vs. a protestant?
Jesuit's are Catholics. They initially started as a group of men who considered themselves God's enforcers, and were granted positions of priesthood after approaching the Pope. Eventually, the Jesuits started gaining influence over the church and took many of the measures that formed the Catholic institution we know today. So, the Jesuit Order's basic beliefs are roughly the same as a Catholic's.
They were the largest roman catholic religous order led by Ignatius Loyola. They caused war and other things to slow down the advance of protestanism.
Christian humanists were scholars who combined humanistic thought with Christian beliefs, while humanists focused on the study of classical literature and culture from ancient Greece and Rome. Christian humanists sought to reform the Catholic Church from within, advocating for a return to the original teachings of Christianity. They believed in the importance of individual conscience and personal piety, in contrast to the more secular focus of humanists on human potential and achievement.
The Jesuits' focus on education helped spread Catholic teachings and combat the spread of Protestantism during the Counter Reformation. By establishing schools and universities, they were able to train and educate individuals who would actively promote Catholic beliefs and values, effectively strengthening the Catholic Church's influence. Additionally, education provided a platform for the Jesuits to engage in intellectual debates and defend Catholic doctrine against Protestant criticisms.
ghjytikuyk.,uyjkgy,lhfg,j,l;
After the Reformation of Luther, Calvin and Zwingli etc. The Catholic Church counter reformed. This was done with the Council of Trent and its three meetings. St Ignatius whom im sure u know wasn't a follower, saw what had happened to the Catholic Church in Rome and put together the 'Jesuits". The Jesuits were a counter-reforming order who took up vows of poverty, and weren't attached to any local governments so would not be corrupt at all. They re-converted back all Lutherans and external followers of the Catholic Church, they did this be re-affirming beliefs, teachings, and with the Counter-Reformation and no corruption. The Catholic Church separated itself from other religions. This may be seen as a negative factor, but thanks to St. Ignatius who reformed the Jesuits 13 000 Jesuits followers joined within the next 5 years.
No, the Jesuits and the Jews are not the same. The Jesuits are a religious order within the Catholic Church, formally known as the Society of Jesus, founded in the 16th century by St. Ignatius of Loyola. In contrast, Jews are members of the Jewish faith, which is one of the oldest monotheistic religions, with a rich cultural and historical heritage. While both groups have made significant contributions to education and social justice, their beliefs, practices, and histories are distinct.
As there are literally thousands of non-Catholic beliefs, if not millions, you would have to ask a more specific question to get a meaningful answer.