is a theory used in electrochemistry that relates the potentials and currents from differing constituents to come up with a 'weighted' potential at zero net current. In other words, it is an electrode potential resulting from a simultaneous action of more than a single redox couple, while the net electrode current is zero.
a completely mixed reactor. the concentration in the reactor is the same that flows our of the reactor
If you mix cement ,sand and water you get mortar If you mix cement and stone pebbles or chips you get concrete Concrete.Sometimes gravel is mixed with it, too.
Pre-mixed concrete is beter as it made to BSI standards and hand mixed (dry bagged) can be weakend by an inexperianced person mixing it. But it depends on what you are using the concret for; if its just a slab for a garden shed to go on it dose not realy make much differance, but if its structural you best get it pre-mixed. Regards Colin
The answer is a hod.
Preethi Mixer
V. I. Fabrikant has written: 'Mixed boundary value problems of potential theory and their applications in engineering' -- subject(s): Applied Mechanics, Boundary value problems, Engineering mathematics, Potential theory (Mathematics)
Carbon dioxide gas.
strong domination, mixed domination,domination cliques
The potential for someone to come along later on and get the wires mixed up causing damage to electrical appliances or lights.
I think you have mixed Charles Dickens for Charles Darwin.
the Melting-pot theory
the Melting-pot theory
In my theory i believe that this happens when concave and complex glasses are mixed together.
Daniel Mence Kroll has written: 'Theory of electrical instabilities of mixed electronic and thermal origin'
Oh dear, this question is really mixed up. The steady state theory is just history now, but the Big Bang is the main current theory. Try again with a clearer version of the question, if you can.
The heliocentric 'theory' is not really a theory at all, more an assertion that the Sun is at the centre of the solar system. Copernicus's theory assumes that the Sun is at the centre and provides a model of the planets' orbits that uses circles and epicycles to explain the observed orbits. He said it was simpler than the old "geocentric" (Earth centred) Ptolemaic system, but it was not really, it actually had more epicycles. Note: Perhaps the questioner got mixed up. The Copernican theory IS a heliocentric theory. Perhaps the question is about the geocentric theory and the Copernican theory. Anyway, Kepler simplified the heliocentric theory and now we know that his model is correct.
Gold on the selves is actually an amalgam ( mixture of several metals) so it is mixed with aluminium, iron etc. In theory pure gold is malleable