Yes. In the states I practice in it is definitely a conflict of interest and must be completely disclosed and the client given the option to find other counsel. If you are unhappy with the settlement, you should file a grievance with the state bar commission.
Attorney associate with those in their professions, and develop friendships. This does not change their duty and obligation. Didn't you ever watch the TV program J.A.G.? It's a good example of this.
Local newspaper reports of the case; any of several reporters online or in paper/magazine format; a creditor who learns of it; the opposing party in the litigation; the attorney for the opposing party; you or your attorney reporting the "winnings." If the civil suit or the underlying claim did not exist at the time of filing, no problem. If it did exist and you failed to disclose the claim in Schedule B and the Statement of Financial Affairs, you are looking at perjury in addition to forfeiting the winnings. If you did disclose it, the trustee caould have taken the case away from the attorney handling the case for you, or abandoned it. If the latter, you have no problem.
Opposing means to be in conflict or disagreement with something or someone, to resist or act against something, or to be on the opposite side of an issue or argument.
conflict
If you are referring to them being opposing counsel in the same case - I believe the Bar Code of Ethics would prevent it due to the possible appearance of conflict of interest.
It's known as "collusion"
an opposing force
Conflict
a conflict is a disagreement.a clash between opposing forces or opposing elementsIt means the problem
It is a conflict.
The attorney who calls the witness conducts a direct examination. The opposing attorney may then conduct a cross examination. The first attorney may then conduct a redirect exam, whereupon the opposing attorney may conduct a recross exam.
Conflict