0
Name three changes that came about in the church as a result of Vatican Council?
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
De-emphasis on ritual and statuary- which hit the ecclesiastical Wares firms like a bombing raid!- the advent of the so-called Flying Washboard Altar- where the celebrant faces the congregation throughout the Mass. The phase out of Latin as the official ritual language of worship ( point two) Modification of fast and dietary laws to a bare minimum. ( some people still observe the Friday laws out of either penance or economy!)- There were many changes- also maybe TOO MUCH of what might be called ( Interaction) on Hymn singing ( OK up to a point) and in the worship itself- some could almost say an excess ( compared to the past) of (Audience Participation)- and with that- a new wave of tolerance, botgh inter-racial and towards other faiths- hate Propaganda towards other faiths well it has been scaled back to the vanishing point. Amen.
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Wiki User
∙ 11y agoThe Mass is said in the vernacular
minor orders the position of sub deacon were abolished
Extraordinary Ministers of the Eucharist were created
The priests faces the people when offering Mass and the people participate
the conditions for indulgences were changed
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What did the Old Catholic Church did different then the present?
Many changes occurred as a result of the 2nd Vatican Council, often called "Vatican II," in the early to mid 1960s. One big change was the priest now faced the congregation, instead of performing the mass with his back to them. Another was the mass changed from mostly in Latin to mostly in English (or whatever the native language of the congregation was). And a big change was that Catholics were now permitted to attend a synagogue or go to a Jewish wedding or attend a ceremony in a non-Catholic church with their friends if they wanted to. Also, some of the negative statements about Judaism were removed from the church's teachings: the pope said it was wrong to blame the Jews for the death of Jesus and that anti-Semitism was a sin..Catholic AnswerThe Old Catholic Church is a breakaway schism that occurred after Vatican Council I in the 19th century. The First Vatican Council formally defined Papal Infallibility and the Old Catholics took issue with that, formally breaking ties with Rome. They still maintain a valid priesthood and valid sacraments. The other Church which formed at the same time was the Polish National Catholic Church, which went into schism for the same reasons. Those two aligned themselves with the schismatics who formed the Orthodox Church in the East back in the 12th century.
Did the doctrines of the Catholic Church change with Vatican II?
Yes and No. It depends on how you mean "doctrines." Some of what the church teaches is considered dogma - central truths of the faith that are revealed by God. These cannot and did not change, but our understanding of them, and thus the way the Church describes them, can and does change. In this sense there were changes at Vatican II. Not a single article of Faith was rescinded by the Council, nor was any new dogma established. The fundamental teaching of the Christian Faith did not change, as some of the Council's critics have claimed. Some of what the church teaches is considered doctrine - truth derived from or related to dogma, but not necessarily central or necessary for salvation. These can and do change to some degree, though again it is more often that it is the way they are presented that changes. However some things clearly changed, for example, the Church's attitude toward ecumenism and religious freedom are doctrinal in some respects, but also pastoral. And the orientation of the church changed at Vatican II towards these and many other theological-pastoral teachings. Finally, some of what the Church 'teaches' are really disciplines. These can always change, and many did change at Vatican II, or more accurately as a result of the new principles and presentation of doctrine by the Council. This is the way we do things, like whether the Eucharist is celebrated always in Latin, or in the vernacular as a n option. This is not doctrine, but sometimes people think of theses things as such. Certain already-established teachings were clarified (e.g. the relationship between the Blessed Mother and the Church) and the Council Fathers spent a lot of time offering guidelines for how to engage the modern world in modern was rather than only clinging to the methods of the past (e.g. the Decree on the Media of Social Communications).
Why did Vatican II stop Masses in Latin?
The Mass is only in English if you are attending in a community where English is commonly spoken. The approved text of the Mass is still composed in Latin and then translated into the vernacular by committees of experts and approved by Bishops for use in their dioceses. This represents a change from the past. Until the early 1970s, the Mass was always celebrated worldwide in Latin, even in communities where no one understood Latin. This was one of the major changes implement as a result of the Vatican II Council. The changes was made to enable greater participation and wider comprehension. At the same time that translations were made into the vernacular, other major changes were made in the content and order of the Mass.
What social changes occurred as a result of King Henry the VIII broke with the catholic church?
the chrch of england
As the Vatican is not a member of the UN could Italy annex it without repercussions?
No Italy could not take that action without repercussions. Vatican City (as the Holy See) does hold observer status at the UN. Also, Vatican City as it exists today is the result of the Lateran Treaty of 1929 between the Catholic Church and Italy.
What kind of books did the Council of Trent publish?
The Council, itself, published nothing except it's resolutions. However, as a result of the Council, the Church published a new Missal, a new Catechism, a new Breviary, etc. So we are mostly talking liturgical and religious books.
Did a list of books considered dangerous to the Church is a result of the Catholic Counter-reformation?
No, the censorship of books goes back to pre-Christian times, and the first record we have of books being condemned and burned was in the Acts of the Apostles. The first document we have condemning books was at the First Council of Nicaea in 325 A.D. The Index, as we knew it up until the Second Vatican Council only came into existence in the early 16th century due to the advent of the printing press. See the articles below about both.
Is it true that the Nicene Creed was a result of the first Council of Nicaea in AD 325?
Although it was not finalised until many years later, the Nicene Creed was formulated by the Council of Nicaea in the year 325, and is the result of that Council.
What is the American Catholic Church?
If you are using "American Catholic Church" as a proper noun, then there is a protestant denomination which had its roots in the Old Catholic Church (a breakaway from the Catholic Church after Vatican Council I), which styles itself "Catholic"..If you are using the term as descriptive of the Catholic Church in America, then it is a result of a heresy called Americanism, which was officially condemned by Pope Leo XIII in his apostolic letter, Testem Benevotentiae (January 22, 1899) addressed to Cardinal Gibbons, who was the ninth Archbishop of Baltimore until his death in 1921. Americanism said that the Catholic Church should adjust its doctrines, especially in morality, to the culture of the people, it emphasised the "active" virtues of social welfare and democratic equality, it underrated the "passive" virtues of humility and obedience to ecclesiastical authority.
What significant events happened at the Second Vatican Council?
.Catholic AnswerBlessed Pope John XXIII, of happy memory, called the Second Vatican Council to "update" the Church: NOT to change anything, such as dogma or doctrines, but to find new and more contemporary ways of presenting Our Blessed Lord's message of salvation to modern man. The Council, in its sixteen documents (see below) attempted to update the language and presentation of the faith in numerous areas. It called for greater participation of the laity in the life of the Church pointing out that every single baptized member of the Church is called to holiness, not just an elite group of clergy, nuns, sisters, and brothers. As such, the Council called for holiness of all its members. The most regrettable failure of the Council (so far) has been that its message was hijacked by those who were preaching the "Spirit of Vatican II" (as opposed to the letter). Their agenda has been shown to be an abysmal failure as witnessed by the wholesale departure of priests, brothers, nuns, and sisters from the religious life, the wholesale departure of the faithful from the Church, and the nearly complete neglect of the sacraments and ridicule of Church doctrines by those who claim to be "Catholic".
What happened to the Catholic Church as a result of Vatacin 2?
As a result of Vatican II: mass was said in the national language of that particular country, the priest faced the congregation rather than the same way as well as Ministers of the Eucharist, Word, etc. The congregation also said prayers aloud with the priest and said responses instead of saying their own, individual prayers silently. As a result of Vatican II catholics took a more tolerative view towards other religions & did more for charity.
Result of category B exame 13 march 2011 punjab pharmacy council?
result
