answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Abdul Muzaffar Muhi-ud-Din and Shah Jahan are historians of Aurangzeb.

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

1mo ago

Jadunath Sarkar and Irfan Habib are two notable historians who have extensively studied the reign of Aurangzeb in India. Sarkar's biographies and works on the Mughal Empire provide valuable insights into this period, while Habib's research focuses on the economic and social aspects of Aurangzeb's rule.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Names of two historians of the riegn of aurangzeb?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What two names did the Babylonians go by?

Many historians cite two names for Babylonia. One is Babylonia, the other term sometimes used is Sumerian empire.


What is Cleopatras families names?

The ancient Egyptians did not have family names as we know them. In the case of Cleopatra's family, they were named after their dynasty, the Ptolemaic dynasty. The women's names were Cleopatra, Arsinoe, and Berenice. The men were all named Ptolemy with the exception of two Alexanders. Historians give them numbers after their names to avoid confusion.The ancient Egyptians did not have family names as we know them. In the case of Cleopatra's family, they were named after their dynasty, the Ptolemaic dynasty. The women's names were Cleopatra, Arsinoe, and Berenice. The men were all named Ptolemy with the exception of two Alexanders. Historians give them numbers after their names to avoid confusion.The ancient Egyptians did not have family names as we know them. In the case of Cleopatra's family, they were named after their dynasty, the Ptolemaic dynasty. The women's names were Cleopatra, Arsinoe, and Berenice. The men were all named Ptolemy with the exception of two Alexanders. Historians give them numbers after their names to avoid confusion.The ancient Egyptians did not have family names as we know them. In the case of Cleopatra's family, they were named after their dynasty, the Ptolemaic dynasty. The women's names were Cleopatra, Arsinoe, and Berenice. The men were all named Ptolemy with the exception of two Alexanders. Historians give them numbers after their names to avoid confusion.The ancient Egyptians did not have family names as we know them. In the case of Cleopatra's family, they were named after their dynasty, the Ptolemaic dynasty. The women's names were Cleopatra, Arsinoe, and Berenice. The men were all named Ptolemy with the exception of two Alexanders. Historians give them numbers after their names to avoid confusion.The ancient Egyptians did not have family names as we know them. In the case of Cleopatra's family, they were named after their dynasty, the Ptolemaic dynasty. The women's names were Cleopatra, Arsinoe, and Berenice. The men were all named Ptolemy with the exception of two Alexanders. Historians give them numbers after their names to avoid confusion.The ancient Egyptians did not have family names as we know them. In the case of Cleopatra's family, they were named after their dynasty, the Ptolemaic dynasty. The women's names were Cleopatra, Arsinoe, and Berenice. The men were all named Ptolemy with the exception of two Alexanders. Historians give them numbers after their names to avoid confusion.The ancient Egyptians did not have family names as we know them. In the case of Cleopatra's family, they were named after their dynasty, the Ptolemaic dynasty. The women's names were Cleopatra, Arsinoe, and Berenice. The men were all named Ptolemy with the exception of two Alexanders. Historians give them numbers after their names to avoid confusion.The ancient Egyptians did not have family names as we know them. In the case of Cleopatra's family, they were named after their dynasty, the Ptolemaic dynasty. The women's names were Cleopatra, Arsinoe, and Berenice. The men were all named Ptolemy with the exception of two Alexanders. Historians give them numbers after their names to avoid confusion.


Who was the son of Dara Shikoh?

Dara Shikoh had two sons - Suleiman Shikoh who was executed by his uncle Aurangzeb not long after Dara Shikoh himself, and Sipihr Shikoh, who was with his father when he was assassinated but was spared by Aurangzeb and incarcerated for the rest of his life, eventually marrying one of Aurangzeb's daughters.


How did steno's father die?

the answer is unkown even historians don't know the answer. trust me my parents are two of the historians.


Is Lake Gennesaret and the Sea of Galilee connected?

They are two names for the same thing.They are two names for the same thing.They are two names for the same thing.They are two names for the same thing.They are two names for the same thing.They are two names for the same thing.They are two names for the same thing.They are two names for the same thing.They are two names for the same thing.They are two names for the same thing.They are two names for the same thing.


Two reasons historians use to explain the downfall of indus valley cities?

Some historians suggest that environmental factors such as droughts or floods played a role in the downfall of Indus Valley cities. Others believe that invasions from outside groups, such as the Aryans, could have contributed to the decline of these cities.


What are two ways that historians find out about the past?

dogs


What are two questions historians ask themselves?

What is it When was itade


What were the only two foods historians are certain were on the menu?

Wildfowl and corn are the only two foods that historians are certain were on the menu at the first Harvest.


What two types of sources that historians have?

The two different sources are primary and secondary sources


What two things do historians rely on to measure time?

Compass


Which emperor willed on his life that the Roman empire should be split into two parts?

No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.