Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)
Ernesto Miranda was the plaintiff; the state of Arizona was the defendant. In a court case, the plaintiff/petitioner's name is always listed first, and the defendant/respondent's name is listed last.
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)
Ernesto Miranda was the plaintiff (actually the "petitioner"); the state of Arizona was the defendant (actually the "respondent"). In a court case, the plaintiff/petitioner's name is always listed first, and the defendant/respondent's name is listed last.
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)
Ernesto Miranda was the petitioner (like a plaintiff); the state of Arizona was the respondent (like a defendant).
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)
Ernesto Arturo Miranda was the plaintiff/petitioner; the state of Arizona was the defendant/respondent.
Chief Justice Warren
congress
Miranda v. Arizona
Miranda v. Arizona
Miranda v Arizona. Miranda was not told of his 5th amendment rights and when this was brought up in court, the Supreme Court threw out his conviction
Miranda vs. Arizona was decided upon by the US Supreme Court on June 16, 1966.
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)
There were two trials, both titled State of Arizona v. Ernesto Miranda. Miranda was convicted at trial and on retrial and appealed both sets of convictions under the title Miranda v. Arizona; the case never went to trial under that name.In the appeal of the first trial, the US Supreme Court held that Miranda's constitutional rights had been violated, resulting in the first conviction being vacated and the case being remanded for retrial with Miranda's confession excluded as evidence.Miranda was subsequently convicted at his second trial. The decision was affirmed by the Arizona Supreme Court. The US Supreme Court denied certiorari for his second petition, making the Arizona Supreme Court decision final.
Miranda, Henceforth, Miranda rights. You have the right to remain silent, anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney, if you cannot afford an attorney one will be appointed to you by the court. Do you understand these rights as they have been read to you?
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)Miranda vs. Arizona
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)Miranda v. Arizona was appealed to the US Supreme Court from the Supreme Court of Arizona, having been heard exclusively in the Arizona court system. Only one of the three cases consolidated with Miranda, Westover v. United States, was heard in federal court, in the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The remaining two cases, Vignera v. New York and California v. Stewart, were heard in their respective state systems.Chief Justice Earl Warren delivered the opinion of the Court in Miranda v. Arizona.For more information, see Related Questions, below.
people accused of a crime must be informed of their rights
In the landmark supreme court case Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Court held that if police do not inform people they arrest about certain constitutional rights, including their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, then their confessions may not be used as evidence at trial.
The supreme court case Miranda vs Arizona.