0
A previous ruling in an earlier case that provides guidance is known as a precedent. Precedent can be used as a noun or an adjective.
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What were Cleopatras jobs?
Cleopatra was a queen ruling her kingdom was her job.Cleopatra was a queen ruling her kingdom was her job.Cleopatra was a queen ruling her kingdom was her job.Cleopatra was a queen ruling her kingdom was her job.Cleopatra was a queen ruling her kingdom was her job.Cleopatra was a queen ruling her kingdom was her job.Cleopatra was a queen ruling her kingdom was her job.Cleopatra was a queen ruling her kingdom was her job.Cleopatra was a queen ruling her kingdom was her job.
When was Caesar ruling and when was he assassinated?
139 ruling assassinated in 124 b.c.
What was the social structure of the mound builders?
They were a chiefdom with a ruling class and a common class. The mounds were topped by temples and residences of the ruling class. Upon the death of a ruler, the residence would be burned as a cleansing and afterwards the deceased would be buried in a new layer of clay atop the previous mound.
What is the last ruling dynasty of china?
the last ruling dynasty is the ming dynasty
Who is the ruling party during the third president of India?
Congress party was the ruling party.
What is established by the court ruling of an earlier case?
Precedent
What is a term that means a ruling on an earlier case?
Precedent
What was the function of the council of elders?
The council of elders in many societies served as advisors to the ruling authority, providing guidance based on their wisdom and experience. They often played a role in making important decisions, settling disputes, and preserving the traditions and values of the community.
What is the term used for judges following an earlier ruling in a similar case?
The earlier case sets a precedent and often judges following the earlier ruling; however, there are cases where the judge will make a different ruling. Every case and judge is different and it just depends on that particular cases. However, if a judge is going against a previous ruling it would give the lawyers room to question the judge's ruling. The side that looses in this case would probably bring up the other case's ruling and use it to help their side.Additional Information:When a higher court, such as the US Supreme Court, makes a decision it sets a binding precedent for all the courts below it under the doctrine of stare decisis(Latin: let the decision stand). Lower courts are required to adhere to binding precedents although, as noted above, they don't always do so.Following precedent is considered exercising judicial restraint, while certain instances of overturning precedents are considered judicial activism (sometimes called "legislating from the bench"), a practice generally frowned upon.
What term describes a ruling in an earlier legal case that is similar to a current case?
Precedent
When a previous case is distinguished from the facts about a case presented to a court how must the court proceed?
If a previous case is properly and convincingly distinguished on the facts, the ruling in that case may be inapposite.
What is a precedent cases?
Precedebt book means the book maintained by a section for keeping note of importment ruling and decesion for ready reference.
What are the major factors contributing to the Articles of Confederation?
issues of the previous government ruling, representation of the people, the dislike for taxes, and the dislike for national militias.
Is a rebuttal like a conclusion?
No. A rebuttal is a defence used in law to weaken the credibility of the witnesses and/or evidence in regard to a certain incident or previous ruling.
What does Motion to enforce judgment mean?
The Motion to Enforce is a legal filing that requests a court to force someone to obey a previous court ruling.
When the supreme courts hands down a decision in a case that upholds a previous ruling the justices are said to be following which principle?
Stare Decisis
How does Niccolo Machiavelli distinguish his study of the art of ruling from that of earlier writers?
Machiavelli differed from earlier writers by focusing on the practical aspects of ruling rather than moral or idealistic considerations. He believed rulers should prioritize maintaining power and stability, even if it meant using deceit and cruelty. Machiavelli's pragmatic approach in "The Prince" marks a departure from the traditional emphasis on virtue and ethics in political thought.
