Sources of information about history are what is written, what is said, and what is physically preserved. These sources include original documents, autobiographies, memoirs, published source collections, essays, books, letters, diaries, artifacts, newspapers, historical photos, journals, Documentary Films, oral testimony, censuses, tax records, and city directories.
actual records that have survived from the past.
mediaval time or middle ages
There are more than five types of historians that study the human race. The more historians that look at the challenges and triumphs of the human race, the more insight they can give.
he made a great consittution and was motivated to his work but he used to cheet
Mercantilism
Candidate Key is used to uniquely identify the records of a table. An attribute becomes a Primary Key, if all the other candidate keys lose race for being qualified as Primary Key.
Primary sources are used commonly among historians. A primary source of information is an account from someone that was present at a certain time or event.
to be happy
to be happy
primary and secondary sources.
primary and secondary sources.
Present day historians investigate the histories already written by: * checking the resources used by historians who have written about a particular subject; * by investigating any sources that were overlooked; and * searching primary, secondary leads that may bring to light new sources of historical information.
Early historians often used information from unverifable sources.
Early historians often used information from unverifable sources.
Early historians often used information from unverifable sources.
Early historians often used information from unverifable sources.
You do not need to find the sources that were used. Since it is a primary source it does not need any outside sources.
There are three categories for historians and their source material: Primary: ancient historians existed at the time of the event Secondary: ancient historians existed after the event and analysed/used primary sources modern: Modern historaians who use either of the above majority of the primary sources do not criticize Augustus and idolize him, in contrast some secondary sources like Tacitus hate Augustus Overall however it is agreed(by many modern historians) that Augustus was emperor because of his freinds Marcus vipsanius Agrippa and Gaius Maecanus. The primary sources(historians) were either sychophantic or terrified of persecution by Augustus, the Secondary sources are also biased because they were hired by patrons with vested interests in Augustus's depiction. In short thereare a range of views all with their own bias.