The anwer to this question is more properly determined if the countries type of government is known. A high Birth Rate would affect different types of governments in different ways as a developing country would also be affected by the type of country it was, and how developed they actually are. A country going through an industrial period would be affected differently from a country who has a stake in the global market, or one which is still driven by agricultural commerce. I will answer in regards to the only government I have ever experienced myself, the democracy of the United States of America. 1. An increased birth rate would cause an increase in health care costs, and consequentially, any other costs which could be associated with the current age and development of the population boom generation. (i.e. the baby boomers). Developing countries are defined in part by the average income of an average citizen, and unless a country has a thriving economy to produce jobs for the increase in population numbers, the ultimate result will be a plateau and eventual decline of the economy. Population and economical growth have always been defined as a product of one another. When one levels out, so does the other. 2. An increased birth rate would cause an increase in the amount of representatives who are employed within the house of representatives. As the increase in birth rate would ultimately result in an increase in the average number of voting aged citizens, this would lead to an increase in the amount of politicians each state can employ to represent them within the House of Representatives in Washington, D.C. (This is currently happening in Utah, as they are seeking to expand from three to four districts, gaining one more representative seat in Washington, D.C.) As previously mentioned, these answers are solely based on the type of economical commerce and government the country employs. Answers will vary due to each scenario.
Inadequate fresh water, high infant & child mortality, starvation, low life expectancy, unhygienic living conditions, high crime rate, low wages.
False. The very opposite is true. To reduce the risk of developing cancer, you should reduce the intake of animal fat and eat plant fiber daily.
it should not be held in India as the country will be embarrased due the corruption here.............
to reduce some expenses and when crisis comes you have resource
Yes, Australia regularly helps developing countries both in the form of government funded aid and aid from the private sector.
You can reduce your chances of developing skin cancer by wearing sunblock, avoiding the sun and eating foods that have antioxidants in them. You should practice sun avoidance year around.
To reduce the number of gooks and spooks getting in to our country
No I do not. Countries should follow their own fiscal policy
Yes because it is devoloping very good so yes, i think. Idk? Srry :(
Yes, the people of a country of country is the asset of that country. But there are some important obstacle behind this like if the government can't serve her people. Developing country like Bangladesh should utilize her man power. this is the first & main key to be developed for a country .
no common wealth should not be held in developing country like India cause of common wealth the corruption in India has been increased .The government is wasting lots of money on common wealth's .The Rich are becoming more richer games held in India show that we are today also doing the slavery of Britisher's.
Prevent adverse balance;credit,competitive
test it