answersLogoWhite

0


Want this question answered?

Be notified when an answer is posted

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Russian revolution was caused by bad leadership?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about General History

Who were Russian revolutionaries who took control of the government in November 1917 and pledged to make peace with Germany?

Bolsheviks, who took over in the Russian October Revolution of 1917. a very bad group indeed. Bolsheviks Bolsheviks Bolsheviks Bolsheviks


What is bad leadership?

There can be several causes of 'bad leadership', depending on what the leader experiences during his/her moment in power. Also, it does move into the category of what bad actually means, and that it depends on the eye of the beholder. For one example many people consider Hitler to have been a 'bad' leader, but some believe Hitler to have led well. Bad leadership is often not caused by the leader, but by the events which take place during his or her leadership. For an example somebody may say that Gordon Brown has led badly, but others may blame it on the events which have taken place, for example the credit crunch, which Gordon Brown could do nothing to stop. Bad leadership could be caused if the leader was unwise in his decision, it could happen in many ways, it is all dependent on the eye of the beholder, on what the people believe to be bad leadership, for example Labour MPs may believe Mr Browns leadership to be outstanding (this I highly doubt), but Conservative MPs may believe Mr Browns governing policy to be completely attrocious. In conclusion, I believe that 'bad leadership' is completely dependent on the moods of the people, and leadership could be considered good by the people in one country, for example communism, but if that leadership moves to another country it is considered bad.


How did agricultural revolution have to do with the french revolution?

The agricultural revolution has nothing to do with the french revolution . the agricultural revolution is about the problems in the countryside with food to grow thing and all the rich people had no need to grow food and the french revolution is the economic revolution


Differences in Russian and french revolution?

Both the French and Russian revolutions occurred because of two main reasons. Both of these revolutions were the direct results of bad leadership and a bad economy. These two reasons along with other factors caused both of these revolutions. Although they were both similar, they also had differences. A difference between the two is that the Russians had an unsuccessful "pre-revolution" in 1905. Another difference between these two revolutions is the fact that the French turned towards a democracy while the Russian government became communist. Both the French and Russian revolutions had similar causes but ended up with different results. Both of these countries had different internal factors which cause the results. The Russians had Lenin and the French had the Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen. I would also like to point out 1 more similarity between these two revolutions and that is the fact that both Czar Nicholas II and King Louis XVI were executed soon after the revolutionaries took power. It's just strange to see how two similar countries with so many similar reasons for revolting would end up with so very different governments. this is one of the differences.there were many more.


Did the roman empire have a bad leadership?

yes it did

Related questions

What was life like for peasants during the Russian revolution?

bad


How did World War I effect Russia?

World War 1 began very positively for Russia. The Russian population united and the loyalty to the Tsar increased. The Socialists were actually the only people who opposed Russian involvement in the war. The Russian army lacked effective leadership and modern wapons. This caused the Russian army doing very bad in the war. The Russian population doubted the government and the whole war-idea. It were the mounting military defeats, people publicly complaining about political decisions, the food shortage, rising prices and fuel shortage that in the end caused the Russian Revolution, and made Russia a communistic land.


What are some common causes of revolution in history?

Revolutions are generally caused by bad leaders, bad economy, or by another countries' demonstration of a successful revolution.


What were the long-term effects of the Cultural Revolution?

it caused the crops and stuff to go bad


What were causes and effects of the Rwanda crisis?

caused by bad leaders,bad economy or by another countries demostration of succefull revolution


Who were Russian revolutionaries who took control of the government in November 1917 and pledged to make peace with Germany?

Bolsheviks, who took over in the Russian October Revolution of 1917. a very bad group indeed. Bolsheviks Bolsheviks Bolsheviks Bolsheviks


How did World War 1 effect Russian peasants?

they didn't have enough food and they had a bad economy and they were in their own Russia revolution.


What is bad leadership?

There can be several causes of 'bad leadership', depending on what the leader experiences during his/her moment in power. Also, it does move into the category of what bad actually means, and that it depends on the eye of the beholder. For one example many people consider Hitler to have been a 'bad' leader, but some believe Hitler to have led well. Bad leadership is often not caused by the leader, but by the events which take place during his or her leadership. For an example somebody may say that Gordon Brown has led badly, but others may blame it on the events which have taken place, for example the credit crunch, which Gordon Brown could do nothing to stop. Bad leadership could be caused if the leader was unwise in his decision, it could happen in many ways, it is all dependent on the eye of the beholder, on what the people believe to be bad leadership, for example Labour MPs may believe Mr Browns leadership to be outstanding (this I highly doubt), but Conservative MPs may believe Mr Browns governing policy to be completely attrocious. In conclusion, I believe that 'bad leadership' is completely dependent on the moods of the people, and leadership could be considered good by the people in one country, for example communism, but if that leadership moves to another country it is considered bad.


What were the long the terms of the Russian Revolution?

It caused many things like the crops going bad and soon the ruler of Russia steeped down and gave all the power to the people. It helped in the end because the people were fighting to have equal conditions with everyone and it finally worked.


How did agricultural revolution have to do with the french revolution?

The agricultural revolution has nothing to do with the french revolution . the agricultural revolution is about the problems in the countryside with food to grow thing and all the rich people had no need to grow food and the french revolution is the economic revolution


What is the Russian word for bad?

The Russian word for "bad" is "плохо" (pronounced "plokho").


Differences in Russian and french revolution?

Both the French and Russian revolutions occurred because of two main reasons. Both of these revolutions were the direct results of bad leadership and a bad economy. These two reasons along with other factors caused both of these revolutions. Although they were both similar, they also had differences. A difference between the two is that the Russians had an unsuccessful "pre-revolution" in 1905. Another difference between these two revolutions is the fact that the French turned towards a democracy while the Russian government became communist. Both the French and Russian revolutions had similar causes but ended up with different results. Both of these countries had different internal factors which cause the results. The Russians had Lenin and the French had the Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen. I would also like to point out 1 more similarity between these two revolutions and that is the fact that both Czar Nicholas II and King Louis XVI were executed soon after the revolutionaries took power. It's just strange to see how two similar countries with so many similar reasons for revolting would end up with so very different governments. this is one of the differences.there were many more.