Want this question answered?
SJhortest job First
A scheduler is the heart of every RTOS. It provides the algorithms to select the task for execution. Three common scheduling algorithms are > Cooperative scheduling > Round-robin scheduling > Preemptive scheduling RTOS uses preemptive (priority based) scheduling. In some cases, real-time requirements can be met by using static scheduling.
Omar Moursli has written: 'Scheduling the hybrid flowshop' -- subject(s): Branch and bound algorithms, Production scheduling
Chae Young Shin has written: 'A comparison of task scheduling algorithms on multicomputers' -- subject(s): Multiprocessors, Algorithms
Round robin schedulingPriority schedulingShortest job firstBy Tirok
Graph coloring is used in several algorithms, for example in scheduling algorithms. Whether you use that in your "daily life" or not depends on what area you work in.
Yes, it is one of many scheduling algorithms suitable for time sharing.However it is not suitable for scheduling in a hard realtime OS that must consistently meet deadlines.
cycle counter scheduling is used in windows vista
This refers to Round Robin scheduling, a method implemented in various situations that require scheduling algorithms e.g in memory management within a CPU. If for example you have 5 processes loaded in memory, RR scheduling would allocate an even number of time quanta from the processor to each process in turn, returning back to the first process and continuing as new processes are added and old ones are completed.
c program for shortest remaining time scheduling algo
First-Come, First-Serve (FCFS) scheduling is one of the simplest scheduling algorithms in the realm of operating systems, and its implementation offers a straightforward approach to process management. In FCFS scheduling, processes are executed in the order they arrive in the ready queue, essentially adhering to a first-in, first-out (FIFO) strategy. The fundamental principle behind FCFS is straightforward: the first process to request the CPU gets executed first, and subsequent processes have to wait until the CPU is available again. The mechanism of FCFS scheduling is simple to understand and implement. When a process enters the system, it gets placed in the ready queue. The CPU scheduler picks the process at the head of the queue for execution and allocates the CPU to this process. The process continues to execute until it either finishes or gets blocked for I/O or some other reason, at which point the CPU is allocated to the next process in the ready queue. This cycle continues until all processes are executed. FCFS is non-preemptive, meaning once the CPU is allocated to a process, it retains control of the CPU until it completes its execution or gets blocked for some reason. This characteristic simplifies the scheduler design, making FCFS an attractive choice for simple systems or batch processing environments where jobs are more or less independent of each other. However, FCFS scheduling has its set of drawbacks. It can lead to the "convoy effect," where short processes have to wait for a long process to complete, leading to suboptimal CPU utilization. The average waiting time under FCFS scheduling can be high if long processes arrive at the queue early. Moreover, FCFS does not prioritize processes based on their importance or urgency, which can be a significant limitation in scenarios where certain processes require immediate attention. Despite its limitations, the simplicity and ease of implementation of FCFS scheduling make it a viable choice in specific scenarios, especially in systems with minimal process management requirements or in batch processing environments. It serves as a foundation for understanding more complex scheduling algorithms and provides a clear illustration of how process scheduling works at a basic level. In a nutshell, FCFS scheduling is a fundamental, easy-to-implement scheduling algorithm that executes processes based on their arrival order, adhering to a non-preemptive, first-in, first-out strategy. While it may not be the most efficient or versatile scheduling algorithm, its simplicity makes it a useful stepping stone in the study of operating system scheduling algorithms, paving the way for understanding more advanced scheduling strategies.
Gerhard H. Magnus is known for his work in the field of computer science, particularly for his contributions to graph theory and algorithms. He has written several books and research papers on topics such as network flow algorithms, scheduling algorithms, and graph coloring.