There are records retention laws and regulations in every state covering businesses and corporations. If the records actually were 'redundant" why would they keep more than one set anyway.
Documentation should be filed in files or folders chronologically.
HIGH, if all records should be kept of a company, whether it is monetary spending/earning, hiring/firing of an employee, or taking days off for any reason, records should be kept in case the government comes asking for records, or in case a person wants to sue your company.
Depends on the type of records, For example dental records (after the patient has left the practise) is 7 years, Financial records are 10 years
logical network diagram
Good documentation has various characteristics. For example, it should be clear, concise and legible. It should also be fact checked.
To download records to a computer the person must have a special player that hooks to the computer if they do the option should pop up automatically for most. If not then they should invest in one or pay a company to do it for them. Many new records come with a free digital download code.
Executive appointments are a matter of public record or within a company, a matter of company record. The courthouse should have records of all appointed employees.
Usually you confirm you have or what condition every mobile or motorized vehicle the company owns from records that show you "should" have them.
The following are restricted items that should not be imported into Korea without proper documentation
Within the United States, you can contact the State Board of Education within the state the school existed. All records by law must be maintained. The records might be held by another institution, and the State Board of Education should have a record of where the documentation is being held.
You should not need any documentation to receive help from an emergency shelter.
This depends on the size of a company because if the owners are resposible for the custody of an asset this doesn't matter so much. It also depends on the type of asset you are talking about. If an asset is not something easily convertable to cash this also does not matter much. In most cases, the person who keeps financial records for a company should not also be the one who has access to the asset. The reason for this is that if they do, it can be quite easy for them to steal from the company and cover it up by changing the financial records.