This question is one of personal philosophy, ethics, morality and legalities.
There is no definitive answer to this question, but rather it's a question each person has to answer for themselves.
War criminals should be punished according to the crimes they have committed.
Removed from the throne and prosecuted for war crimes .
Mainly being a woman who usurped a title that should be a man's.
death and rape
Tokyo
War criminals should be punished according to the crimes they have committed.
As outside of the ghetto; when people committed crimes, they were prosecuted.
Japanese and Nazi war criminals for "Crimes Against Humanity" .
Yes,crimes committed by people in military service are ordinarily prosecuted before a courts-martial
Yes, war criminals should be prosecuted to uphold the principles of justice, deter future crimes, and provide closure for victims and their families. Prosecution sends a strong message that no one is above the law and serves as a deterrent to others who may contemplate committing similar crimes. It also gives victims an opportunity to see justice served and helps in the process of healing and reconciliation.
yes
What happens to minors who commit crimes in Saudi Arabia depends on the crime that was committed. In most cases, they are prosecuted through the Juvenile Justice System. In other cases, they are prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, which is often not documented by the police.
I respectfully disagree. If crimes were never committed then there would be no necessity to hate the offense. It is the perpetrator, themselves, that choose to break the law. Shame on THEM!
germans
It help heighten the chance of persecuting criminals and even preventing crime by seeing possible criminals. overall it helps keep the citizens safe :P
Crime committed against "the state." Individuals (who are victims or complainants) appear in court to testify as to the facts of the crimes committed against them, but the the crime is prosecuted as if it were a crime against all citizens of the state.
The criminal was prosecuted for his crimes in a court of law and judged by a jury of his peers.