Yes. Depending on the crime though. Like if they stole somthing from a store, you would make them return it and make them apologize. But if they got in a fight, you would have to think about that one. Because they might have fought back in defence. So it depends on what crime.
they should be punished (add) ,punishment is the cure.
Yes, because it is a crime.
The worst crime to the Lilliputians is treason against their emperor. This is considered a grave offense that threatens the stability and order of their society and is punished severely.
Nobody, women, men or children should suffer violence against their person in our (so called) civilised society. Violence in any form is a crime and should be stopped.
Then it would be crime because it would be acceptable. the only thing that makes something a crime is that you will get punished for it. if there are no consequences then it will not be considered a crime because everyone will be doing it. :)
That would depend on the crime and how long ago. Any crime against children would be NO
They should be punished. The severity of the punishment however needs to fit the crime that took place.
Suicide.
No !
"We should annex Hawaii immediately. It was a crime against the United States, it was a crime against white civilization, not to annex it two and a half years ago" -Roosevelt
It depends on the charge. Any crime against children - NO
An eye for an eye means that a person who steals $50 should only be punished to that degree. Not more nor less. If he kills someone, then that is much more serious and should be punished in some way that is equal. The punishment for a crime should be equal to that crime. No more or not less. A small amount of stealing doesn't mean the death penalty.