No - except in cases where there is no cure for their condition and a new experimental treatment has shown promise and the parents elect to see if the experimental procedure might help. In that respect the child is part of medical research.
no
no!
Due to the lack of sufficient medical research, arrowroot should be used with caution in children, women who are pregnant or breast-feeding, and people with liver or kidney disease.
cause animals differ from humans and they have different abilities and their abilities are based on their medical research
I don't think any animals should be used for medical research.. but if they need some two weeks is not long enough for them to get adopted they need longer than that to find a family that will love them. If a child wasn't adopted in two weeks would you just use them for medical research?
Medical research
Their venom is. and in any case all living thing are the subject of constant scientific and medical research.
Animals should not be used for drug development or medical research for the following reasons: Animals are killed and kept in captivity for the extent of their lives. A lot of the things tested on animals are never even used. It is expensive to keep animals alive for the sole purpose of testing drugs and other devices on them. Animals and humans are not the same.
Using animals in scientific research is not humane. However, there are times when it becomes necessary for medical tests. Testing for the sake of cosmetics and similar trivial causes should be banned entirely.
Probably not. The estate may be used to pay bills but the children should have no personal liabilities.
Due to lack of sufficient medical study, goldenrod should be used with caution in children, women who are pregnant or breast-feeding, and people with kidney disease.
Used for centuries in Western and Chinese herbal medicine mixtures. People with heart, thyroid or serious medical conditions should consult with a medical practitioner. More research needed.