They definitely should! But first, a very accurate definition of an intellectual should be in place. I can suggest one to anyone capable of such a comprehension.
While intellectuals bring valuable knowledge and expertise to the table, ruling the world requires a diverse range of skills and qualities. It is important to have balance in leadership that considers not only intellectual capabilities, but also emotional intelligence, empathy, and the ability to understand and connect with different types of people. Collaboration among individuals with varied backgrounds and strengths is often more effective in governing than relying solely on intellectuals.
It is impossible to predict who will rule the world in 2020 as global power dynamics are constantly shifting. Many countries and leaders have influence on the world stage, and it is important to consider the complex relationships and events that will shape future global leadership.
The Enlightenment promoted ideas such as individual rights, reason, and questioning of authority that challenged traditional power structures. These ideas inspired revolutions against monarchies and colonial rule, leading to events like the American and French Revolutions. Intellectuals of the Enlightenment provided the philosophical foundation for questioning and changing the existing political systems.
Thomas Hobbes believed in a social contract theory where individuals gave up some of their rights to a governing authority in exchange for protection and security. He argued that an absolute sovereign, either a monarch or a strong centralized government, should rule to maintain order and prevent chaos in society.
Yes, corruption should be abolished as it undermines trust in institutions, weakens the rule of law, and hinders economic development. Efforts to combat corruption are essential to promote transparency, good governance, and accountability in both public and private sectors.
Governments based on rule by one person are called autocracies or monarchies. Rule by a few individuals is called an oligarchy, while rule by many people is called a democracy. These typologies reflect the distribution of power and decision-making authority within a political system.
The World Intellectuals was created in 1990.
Why not!
No because if they did our world would end up a MAD house
A:In an ideal world, government is by democratic process, with one vote per adult person, regardless of race, religion or background. No one person or group should rule the world, and no one person or group is fit to rule the world.
bla bla bla the hand that rocks the cradle can also rule the world ... This proverbe means that is u will cut your hand & make it work it can rule the world we should move the cradle to rule the worls.....
American Intellectuals was created in 1999.
The Responsibility of Intellectuals was created in 1967.
Party Intellectuals was created in 2007-10.
Adolf Hitler
Manifesto of the Fascist Intellectuals was created in 1925.
Just like Canadians should rule Canada, Americans should rule America, Irish should rule Ireland, Germans should rule Germany, Australians should rule Australia, Mexicans should rule Mexico etc etc etc. Wallace believed Scots should rule Scotland NOT English.
no, i dont think anyone should rule the entire world because no matter how wise they are it will cause wars and all their power will go to their head then they wont be so wise anymore. anyway, how would you choose the person anyway??