no,cause if they do,if the woman got shot near the heart,the man will focus on the boob
Because women should have equal rights, and should be able to serve there country.
Absolutely not.
Yes, women should be allowed to serve in combat roles, as they bring valuable skills and perspectives to the military. Many women have demonstrated their capabilities in various military capacities, proving that gender does not determine one's ability to perform effectively in combat situations. Inclusion promotes diversity, enhances team dynamics, and reflects the reality of modern armed forces where roles are increasingly based on individual qualifications rather than gender. Ultimately, the focus should be on the individual's skills, training, and readiness to serve.
None. Women did not serve aboard warships or with combat troops.
beacuse women have the potential
Women should be in combat/army but maybe more like a medic's or not on the front line or first in too battle!
no yes they should be able to participate in combat duty
Yes because women are strong minded and good judgemental
There is no reason why women should not be in combat. My friend's dad was in the army. He said that there were 20 women in his division and 60 men. When his division was at target practice, almost always the women hit the target. He said it was because the women took more time in aiming there shot.
yes, they should be allowed to. women should be treated equaly to men.
Yes, women serve on active duty in the military. In the United States, women have been serving in the armed forces for decades, and there are no gender restrictions on active duty service. Women contribute in various roles and occupations, including combat positions.
Should young men and women be required to serve in the armed forces? Why, Yes.