Women were officially allowed to serve in combat roles in the U.S. military starting in 2013 when the Department of Defense lifted the ban on women serving in combat positions. This policy change opened up all military occupations and positions to women, allowing them to participate in direct combat roles. Prior to this, women had served in various capacities during conflicts but were restricted from formal combat roles. The decision marked a significant milestone in gender equality within the armed forces.
None. Women did not serve aboard warships or with combat troops.
Historically, only men were allowed to fight in wars due to societal norms and beliefs about gender roles, which positioned men as warriors and providers while women were often relegated to domestic responsibilities. This perception was reinforced by the idea that men were physically stronger and more suited for combat. Additionally, cultural values and legal frameworks often excluded women from military service, viewing their primary role as supporters rather than combatants. However, these views have evolved, and many countries now allow women to serve in combat roles.
Women in the military can currently serve in almost every field, except for anything having to do with combat. Women can be in helicopters and such, but they cannot serve as a ground combat soldier, or "grunt", as it is called in the marine corps. P.S. Please recommend me!
During World War II, various organizations provided women opportunities to contribute to the war effort, most notably the Women's Army Corps (WAC) in the United States. The WAC allowed women to serve in non-combat roles, supporting military operations through administrative, logistical, and technical positions. Additionally, organizations like the Red Cross and the Women's Airforce Service Pilots (WASP) enabled women to serve in critical roles, such as nursing and ferrying aircraft, thereby significantly impacting the war effort.
Because women should have equal rights, and should be able to serve there country.
Absolutely not.
beacuse women have the potential
no yes they should be able to participate in combat duty
yes,they should.Women Have a equel position as men
yes, they should be allowed to. women should be treated equaly to men.
yes
Women were officially allowed to serve in combat roles in the U.S. military starting in 2013 when the Department of Defense lifted the ban on women serving in combat positions. This policy change opened up all military occupations and positions to women, allowing them to participate in direct combat roles. Prior to this, women had served in various capacities during conflicts but were restricted from formal combat roles. The decision marked a significant milestone in gender equality within the armed forces.
Women were not allowed to serve as members of the Roman Legions.
Men and women should definitely be allowed to fight side by side in combat. There is nothing that a man can do in battle that a woman cannot also do, from firing weapons to providing medical care.
Women were not allowed to serve in the military.ANSWER 2same as most wars, pretend to be a man - i imagine it does, or did, happen more than we know - women have a long history of serving in combat and can be every bit as capable as man and just dont like to be told they cant - my mom was one who served as a radio operater on B-17's to ferry the planes about and would have jumped at any chance to serve in combat if allowed
no,cause if they do,if the woman got shot near the heart,the man will focus on the boob