There is no reason why women should not be in combat. My friend's dad was in the army. He said that there were 20 women in his division and 60 men. When his division was at target practice, almost always the women hit the target. He said it was because the women took more time in aiming there shot.
beacuse women have the potential
Women should be in combat/army but maybe more like a medic's or not on the front line or first in too battle!
no yes they should be able to participate in combat duty
Because women should have equal rights, and should be able to serve there country.
Yes because women are strong minded and good judgemental
yes, they should be allowed to. women should be treated equaly to men.
yes,they should.Women Have a equel position as men
Men and women should definitely be allowed to fight side by side in combat. There is nothing that a man can do in battle that a woman cannot also do, from firing weapons to providing medical care.
With the large amount of women in the modern army, women inevitably find themselves in combat situations. Women are not intentionally put into combat situations. Women are not allowed into the fire and maneuver branches of armor and infantry. These are the two army branches that go out looking to get into close combat with the enemy. Everyone else, and subsequently the women, avoid direct enemy contact.
In many countries, women were not allowed in combat. But there were cases of women fighting, generally because it was necessary for survival. There were women in the French Resistance. There were women fighting in the Russian Air Force.
In the US Military no children will be accepted. That is the bottom line. In Russia, some children and women took part in active combat but the US refrains from doing so because of the horrors that might result when a women or a child dies in combat.
No - Australians have only had women in combat for the last 5 to 10 years.