Legally, yes. (It does depend somewhat on what exactly "ground" means; for instance, they are obligated to see that you receive an education. However, this can be home schooling, so if your parents don't want you to see the outside of your house for seven years, that's not in and of itself actually illegal.)
Grounding a child until they are 18 is not reasonable. It is important for parents to set appropriate consequences for their child's behavior, but an open dialogue and understanding of the child's feelings and perspective is also crucial for effective discipline and healthy parent-child relationships. A punishment should be age-appropriate and focused on teaching the child to understand and correct their behavior.
Legally, parents cannot ground a child after they turn 18 in Ohio because individuals are considered adults at that age. Once a person reaches the age of 18, they are no longer under their parents' legal guardianship, and parents do not have the authority to impose punishments like grounding on them.
In Washington state, parents are generally responsible for providing food, shelter, and care for their children until the age of 18. Parents cannot legally kick out a child at the age of 16 unless there are special circumstances, such as the child being legally emancipated or approval from a court. It is important to seek legal advice if you are facing this situation.
Parents can seek legal emancipation for the child, which would relieve them of financial responsibility. They can also have the child sign a formal agreement releasing them from any legal obligations. Additionally, parents can contact a family law attorney for guidance on the best course of action.
Open adoption is when the biological mother/father, and their child are still allowed to meet and see eachother, even after the adoption process is complete. Closed adoption is when the biological mother/father of the baby can see their child for a year after the adoption. They can send pictures, letters, etc. After the one year, they have no contact with them, until the child is 18.
Parents can be held responsible for their children's actions in some cases, particularly if they have been directly negligent in supervising or controlling their child's behavior. However, each situation is unique and factors such as the age of the child and the severity of the offense should be taken into consideration before assigning blame solely to the parents.
it depends on the child. if the parent feels they can trust the child, i feel the parents should not have to read their childrens texts.
If the child(ren) are abused they should go to Child Welfare (that's what we call it in Canada) or to a close relative. If they aren't and simply don't like the ground rules of the household and are always into trouble then no, they should be able to emancipate from their parents. I never did understand this emancipation act.
This is a controversial topic. Most would say parents should not be allowed to choose the gender of their child because it will lead to gender imbalance and abortions.
They are not allowed to throw away the child's belongings.
If the parents allow it then yes.
No one should be rude to children, specially their parents, but it is not illegal to be rude to your own child within limits. If it gets to be abusive to the child, endangering the child's safety or wellbeing, then you cross into the realm of not okay.
No. Their children get no choice. Their child would choose to live. Always.
Yes. Anyone who can provide a good home to a child should be allowed to adopt. Gay people and single people have proven to be exemplary parents.
I think their identities should not be protected. The child should know who their mother is and the adopting parents should know who the parents and know what they are dealing with.
There are multiple reasons why adopted children should not be allowed to contact their biological parents, however this is dependent on the reasons why the children was put into foster/adoptive care. For example, some children are removed from their biological parent's care due to a matter of them not being able to care for the child, they may have broken the law are not fit to have the child. Considering this, the child, at the age of 18 are allowed to look into their biological parents if they wish. This is because they will no longer need permission. Many children choose not to do this as they settle with the adoptive families and feel no reason to contact their biological parents. Some children are placed for adoption as their parents feel it is the better option for the well being of the child. However, in these case the parents often opt for an open adoption which is designed so that the biological parents are still allowed relatively regular contact with their child. In this case, i believe it is fully acceptable for the child to have contact with the parent As long as the biological parent did no wrong by the child, i believe they should be able to contact their parents
A stepmother should be allowed to discipline a child such as grounding. However, a stepmother should not be able to physically discipline a child.
Celebrating and discussing Christmas are two differing things. The reasons for celebrating Christmas may be discussed by the teacher. The child not being allowed to celebrate the season is neither here nor there, unless the teacher goes against the wishes of the parents and encourages the child to celebrate Christmas. A full direction by the parents should be obtained by teacher so that there is no conflict with their wishes. The child's welfare must come first.