0
Should parents be solely responsible for their children's actions?
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
parent should be held responsible for children under the age of ten because this way the parent has no excuse for the child's wrong doing. For example a six year srcaches a neighbors car they should pay bit by bit to try and pay the damage of. Two reasons why are first if the child that age was not attend for or watched then yeh that's there fualt. Second the child doesn't know what its doing and isn't' able to pay the payment him or her self. Those are my theries on the problem. Then i think 10-13 should be able to be wacthed to see the types of parents they have. If the parents are all for educhation and teaching wrong from right they should be of the hook.Because the parents have done there partr in parenting and has filled the biggest purpuse in parenting. Which is teaching wrong from right. But on the other hand if the parent should be poor in teach those rules the child wasn't informed of his/her doing. Say the parent live in a very unstabel home and has rekles parents tha child needs help with nuterity skills. That's why theres counsleing for those in need. Any way's if a child is over thirteen there teenagers and now are learning about the true mean world and need to break away from there parents. And doing so they should know the baseks. If ther redon't there should pay and be reasponsible for there actions. Being given more freedom when they make a disishion they better be ready for the consiquenses.
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Wiki User
∙ 12y agoI do believe parents to need to be held accountable for some parts of a child's actions but depending on the crime, if they are old enough to know right from wrong I think the child should suffer the punishment the crime committed. I do not think that the parents should be blamed; to such an extent, if the child is over the age of 13 and can clearly comprehend and make right decisions.
Wiki User
∙ 14y agoWiki User
∙ 13y agoYes, if you are still younger than 18 you are still considered a minor child and your parents are still legally responsible for you.
Wiki User
∙ 14y agoWho should? Over 80% of crime is committed by children raised in single parent homes.
see link
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoYes, most courts have ruled that parents are the ones that are supposed to teach their children right from wrong. If they fail to do that, the result is criminal activity.
Wiki User
∙ 11y agoYes.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why should parents be responsible for the moral education of a child?
because there the parents dauhhh
Should parents be held responsible for their child actions?
A parents' responsibility is to properly raise the children and give them a good foundation on which to build upon later in life. So... Yes if: The child has any type of disability, if the child is younger than 13, or if the parent could not control their child, and did not ask for help. But... No if: The child is in their teen years and does not have a disability that would include horrible behavior. It's the kids' fault, the kid did it, so why should the parents be responsible for it?
In the state of South Carolina can a 17 year old pay child support?
It depends if the 17 year old is emancipated and living on their own. They have proven themselves to be an adult and responsible for their own actions. If he is still at home with his parents you should take it to court.
How long a parent can legally ground a child for?
Parents are responsible until the age of majority, which is 18, although in some states the child can choose to leave home at 17 and cannot be forced to return (a loophole created by state law allowing a child to go to jail at 17). Ina strange twist, in those states (like Georgia) should the child leave at 17, the parents are legally responsible for some of their actions until 18.
Should parents enter their child's room without permission?
Responsible parents do. How else will a parent find out if a child is on drugs or is violating some other rule of yourhome.
Who is responsible for childrens medical bills?
It depends partially on the age of the children. If they are not adults, the parents are responsible. If the children are above the age of majority, and not on their parents' insurance, they should be responsible for their own debts.
Should Parents be penalized when teenagers under eighteen commit crimes?
To a certain extent, yes. Parents are supposed to be responsibly for their childrens actions. And children need to respect their parents as well.
Why should parents get punished for their child's accidents?
Not only could parents be remiss in supervision, but also willfully negligent. In any case, a juvenile offender can be prosecuted for criminal acts, while the parents could be held liable in civil actions.
Reason why parents should be interested their childrens education?
Parents should be interested in their childrens education so the children don't fail.
Should the parent or guardian of a bully be responsible for the child's actions?
Parents or guardians should play a role in addressing and resolving the bullying behavior of their child. While they may not be directly responsible for the child's actions, they have a responsibility to teach and guide their child on appropriate behavior and intervene if necessary. Collaboration between parents, the school, and other relevant stakeholders is crucial in addressing and preventing bullying effectively.
Why should you be responsible for other people's actions?
Generally speaking, we are not. We are, however, usually responsible for the actions of our children, and possibly for people in our care.
Do you still get spanked and if you are teenager?
No, teenagers should not be spanked, but they should be made to be responsible for their actions and the parents can ground them; take something away from them such as computer time; TV time; seeing their friends, etc.
Should parents be allowed to read their children's texts?
it depends on the child. if the parent feels they can trust the child, i feel the parents should not have to read their childrens texts.
Why should parents give polio drops to their childrens?
All parents should have their children vaccinated for polio. Polio is a devastating disease, and there is no cure, but with the vaccination, it can be prevented.
Are parents legally responsible for child?
parents are in every way responsible for their child and they should always be there if the child is in need of their parent.
Why should parents be responsible for the moral education of a child?
because there the parents dauhhh
Should parents be responsible for their child's mistakes?
yes
