This is a value judgment that impacts both the safety of people and their ability to earn a living.
In the US, use of robots is usually seen as desireable when doing so removes a person for a hazardous work assignment. When the use of a robot increases productivity but eliminates a job that was not thought to be hazardous, people come down on both sides of the question.
robots can work 24 hours a day and humans can't :P
They have replaced some human workers jobs They work better and more efficiently They save the company money because it does not have to be paid and can run 24 hours
Human Beings will be replaced by robots
Robots are useful to us because they are smarter than most people these days. They have a ''brain'' that functions to do the things that most humans would find as too much ''effort'' or ''boring''. Robots are just like humans but better because they are only programmed to do certain things. BUT robots can kill you.
we can i don't know if we are though.... its hard to answer..... we will just have to wait and see.
robots maybe?
It would be improbable, since robots are not nearly advanced enough to cope with the needs of 30 odd pubescent school children. Heck, I doubt many teachers are unprepared in that category to, I know I am.
there are more than 100000 types of robots
bruiserbots
because they are lazy and they want robots to do everything
many limitations should be placed on robots because robots may fail when you can rely on humons to sit down and figure out the problem
I think Robots are helpful because they help carry heavy things for the army, and help firefighters put out fires. Robots have one thing in common, they all help humans. Robots can also help find people after an earthquake or a tornado. Robots help people carry things. My opinion is that robots are helpful