Nuclear Regulatory Commission
the Germans' use of unrestricted submarine warfare
You say 'profound effect'
The Battle of Concord was fought in guerrilla warfare style with colonists sniping from behind rocks and trees at the British soldiers as they marched from Concord back to Boston. The British were more used to fighting in open fields with the armies facing each other in long fronts. The British were on a single road in column formation in the open while the colonists shot from concealed positions.
They ambushed the retreating British forces and fought covering themselves in the woods and behind stone walls using a tactic like a guerrilla warfare.
There has not been nuclear warfare. There have been two nuclear attacks. Nuclear warfare denotes the use of nuclear weapons by both or all opposing sides. The only use of nuclear weapons in warfare were the two bombings by the US of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and it was the intent of the US to bring WW2 with Japan to a quicker conclusion.
I believe no one should use nuclear weapons.
(China Syndrome) and ( Silkwood) dealt with Nuclear-power safety issues- quite distinct from nuclear warfare, bomb scares and possible terrorist use.
Unless you are involved in governmental policy making, which most of us are not, the second best way to prevent the use of nuclear weapons is to raise awareness of the dangers of nuclear warfare and hopefully that will cause sufficient interest so that the government will act accordingly.
The discovery , development , use and proliferation of nuclear weapons , the development of bacteriological warfare coming from laboratories ,
Thermonuclear warfare is the use of nuclear weapons in war, either tactically or strategically. Although the term "thermonuclear" technically applies only to the process of fusion, the term is loosely applied to conflict involving fission weapons, fusion weapons, or both (informal synonyms are "atomic war" or "nuclear war").
yo should use surroud sound because it enhances the game.
Certainly yes
If provoked again due to a pre-emptive attack on our homeland, the USA would inot hesitate to use nuclear warheads on another country.
No. During that war it was US doctrine to utilize chemical warfare only for retaliation; the US would not use it first. Biological warfare was not US doctrine. Not to be used. The US reserved the right to "first strike" with nuclear weapons.
tomatoes
No. Yes. That pretty well covers it.