Best Answer
  • Only as a last alternative. Otherwise no! The U.S. is under the impression they can't be beat (they have been once re Vietnam) and were attacked on native soil by terrorists. There are those in the rest of the world that would retaliate if the U.S. attacked them first.
  • No. The USA do not want any more innocent lives lost, that's why they banned nuclear warfare. Instead, the rely on high tech surgical warfare using highly advanced weapons to accurately destroy the 'real' opponents rather than sacrificing innocent lives through weapons of mass destruction and risking the end of the world.
  • Also the USA can be beat, if they lost against the Viet Cong then they could loose to most countries. The USA think they control the world. Britain is most likely the country not to beat in a war (a war not an atomic war) because all they have to defend is a small island and Britain haven't lost a war in over 200 years.
User Avatar

Wiki User

โˆ™ 2012-09-11 13:36:11
This answer is:
User Avatar
Study guides


20 cards

Nuclear fission reactions involve the

Groups are organized by the number of electrons that are found in their outer shell

Nitrogen has an atomic mass of 14 and an atomic number of 7 so the number of neutrons must be

When one element changes into another the number of changes and the process is called

See all cards
3 Reviews

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Should the US use nuclear warfare again?
Write your answer...
Still have questions?
magnify glass
Related questions

Why was there nuclear warfare?

There has not been nuclear warfare. There have been two nuclear attacks. Nuclear warfare denotes the use of nuclear weapons by both or all opposing sides. The only use of nuclear weapons in warfare were the two bombings by the US of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and it was the intent of the US to bring WW2 with Japan to a quicker conclusion.

Do you think That Muslims should use nuclear bombs?

I believe no one should use nuclear weapons.

Movie featuring Byron nuclear plant?

(China Syndrome) and ( Silkwood) dealt with Nuclear-power safety issues- quite distinct from nuclear warfare, bomb scares and possible terrorist use.

Why should you use nuclear?

It gives you energy you can use in your everyday life

Should we people use nuclear energy in the future?

Why not?

What can you do to prevent the use of nuclear weapons?

Unless you are involved in governmental policy making, which most of us are not, the second best way to prevent the use of nuclear weapons is to raise awareness of the dangers of nuclear warfare and hopefully that will cause sufficient interest so that the government will act accordingly.

Should you use nuclear power in the future?

Certainly yes

Which ps3 speaker should you use for modern warfare 2?

yo should use surroud sound because it enhances the game.

What are things that can be considered like Pandora's box?

The discovery , development , use and proliferation of nuclear weapons , the development of bacteriological warfare coming from laboratories ,

Should you use nuclear power if electricity ever had a shortage?


Should you use nuclear power?

No. Yes. That pretty well covers it.

Should nuclear enegry be abolished?

no, if we don't use it someone else will.

People also asked