It doesn't matter whose best interest would be served. At the time he takes office, every U.S. President takes an oath to uphold, protect and defend the U.S. Constitution.
No, they made that rule in the constitution and would have stuck with it. They were very clear that only a natural born citizen should be President.
the vice president
According to current laws (and this should be in the Constitution as well), the Executive Branch, specifically the President of the United States, is allowed the 'power of pardon' (the ability to grant pardons).
Due to the Constitution he cannot and honestly should not, he doesn't have the experience necessary to govern our country. The polls in California show that he is not in step with his constituents and that he isn't doing what is needed for Californians.
Naturalized citizens are not allowed to hold the office of President of the United States. This requirement is stated in the US Constitution.
A president is sworn to uphold and defend the constitution of the US therefore he should never approve any law that would be a violation of that constitution.
A constitution is the rule of order for which a state should be governed. The constitution outlines basic practices that are allowed for the proceedings of law.
the writers of the constitution are dead so....
The Constitution requires it.
NO BECAUSE HE HAD FINISHED IT.
The 25th Amendment !
Yes, the president should be subject to civil trials because in the Constitution of the United States....