answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

in my opinion:

No. Violence is wrong but killing is worse.

One saying that supports this: "Two Wrongs Dont Make A Right."

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Should violent criminals be eligible for the death penalty?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Debate about death penalty here in Philippines?

Death penalty should be a law bcoz criminals are no pity . Its very unfair to the victims.


What is a sentence for society?

For the good of society, violent criminals should remain behind bars.


What is a good sentence for society?

For the good of society, violent criminals should remain behind bars.


Should convicted criminals that receive a life sentence be eligible for parole?

no, a thousand times no, (just my opinion)


Should convicted criminals be eligible for social welfare?

This is a complex issue with ethical and practical considerations. Some argue that convicted criminals should still have access to social welfare to support their basic needs. Others believe that eligibility for such benefits should be reevaluated based on the severity of the crime committed. Ultimately, it is up to policymakers to determine the criteria for social welfare eligibility for convicted criminals.


What should be done about or for the children of violent criminals?

Children shouldn't be allowed to see, do, or be around anything that has any involvement with violence. That will give them the impression that violence is what they are suppose to do.


Should youths who have been convicted of violent crimes be subject to the death penalty?

In my opinion, youth should not be subject to the death penalty. If they have to do time for the rest of their life for murder, I can understand, but death who are we to say so. In my belief, they should not be tried as an adult until they are 21. They cannot drink or buy cigarettes until 21, so why should they be tried as an adul?


How should Canada deal with their war criminals?

Canada should deal with their war criminals by arresting them.


Should the US continue to use the death penalty?

This question is not one that can be answered in a medium such as this one. This question had been debated without any definite answer for at least 75 years. Besides the question about the morality and effectiveness of the death penalty, there is the question of states' rights-- should the federal government be able to ban the death penalty in the several states.


How should canada deal with war criminals?

War criminals should be punished according to the crimes they have committed.


What can you do to take action against death penalty?

The BEST way to take action against the death penalty would be to commit suicide. Anyone stupid enough to not think that there are crimes that deserve the ultimate penalty should not be breathing any more air then those who believe that their crimes should have no repercussions. Locking them away forever in a jail cell so they can prey on the petty criminals who actually have a chance to change is no punishment for animals like that, and is cruel and unusual punishment for the petty criminals. Jeffrey Dahlmer (sp?), Adolph Hilter, Idi Amin...... none of them deserved to die for their crimes? Riiiiiiight......


Why should you stand up for child abuse?

(I hope you mean stand up against it) One reason is that children who are abused fail to develop consciences. A majority of the violent criminals in prison were abused as children.