Opinion It is quite acceptable for a person to believe both in creation as related in The Bible and science. What differs is whether the Biblical account is interpreted as being favoring a young or old earth. There are scientists who believe the Bible, and follow either evolutionary theory or that of Creationism. Both use the same facts, but interpret them from a different world view.
Opinion You can believe in Creationism, as it can make you feel better about the universe and your place in it. On a similar note, you could believe in Narnia, and feel good that such a magical kingdom exists. Alternatively you can 'believe' in what is actually true.
Opinion
You should believe in that which has the greatest chance of being an accurate belief, of being borne out by the facts. In this case, that means that you should believe in evolutionary theory - or rather, that you should accept that evolutionary theory is the single and best testable explanatory model that is consistent with observations in Biology and palaeontology.
There is no harm in believing in biblical creation, if you feel that such belief helps reinforce your religious faith, unless of course you wish to follow a science-related career.
Science tells us what the evidence shows really happened - that the world is around 4.5 billion years old and that our ancestors evolved from earlier species. If you wish not just to believe, but to know, you will learn the scientific answer.
For more information, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation
You yourself will have to choose. According to the theory of Evolution, the Universe (and this Earth) resulted from random events stemming from natural laws, and life then developed by random processes, especially mutations.
The narrative of Divine Creation, which is contained in Genesis ch.1 and 2, states that God created the universe. This teaches us that God exists, that our lives and the world are not random, and that the created things may be assumed to contain vast wisdom in their beautiful and purposeful design. (In recent decades, this wisdom has indeed been partially revealed, through increasingly powerful microscopes.)Evolution through random mutations, on the other hand, may be understood as implying that life is an accident, that perceived beauty and wisdom are ultimately purposeless, and that our instinctive yearning for the Eternal is just an electrical impulse in our brain.
See also:
There is no science about creation. Creation is an unfounded myth with absolutely no evidence to support it. Try asking about evolution instead.
Evolution is scientific fact. Creation is religious faith masquerading as real science.
Frank Lewis Marsh has written: 'Evolution, creation and science' -- subject(s): Religion and science, Evolution, Creation
Creation Today - 2011 Why Evolution Is Not Science 1-21 was released on: USA: 2011
Yes. Creation is a story while evolution is science. The two can really never explain each other. You can not use science to explain any fairy tales.Creationists do think that their story does explain things.Answer:No, of course not. As the above answer states, the two cannot explain each other. Science cannot prove that God didn't create the Universe. A significant percentage of scientists believe in God as the creator and the agent of evolution, or without evolution.Answer:Just because some scientists believe in god, it doesn't mean that they believe in creation stories. The argument that because they believe in god must mean that they don't believe in evolution is illogical. And a creationist would first have to prove god exists and explain god's origins.
There is no science creation story. There are scientific theories concerning the creation and development of the universe, the formation of the solar system and the earth and the emergence and evolution of life.
Praise the Lord - 1973 Special Creation and Evolution God and Science Praise was released on: USA: 17 February 2011
There are a number of these, however, as with evolutionary science, the majority believe in evolution. What is interesting is that a number of Hebrew scholars who believe in evolution acknowledge that Genesis teaches creation and 24 hour days in the Hebrew, even though they don't believe it.
Nevada is pretty evolution friendly when it comes to its science standards. Nevada is also one of the few states that doesn't have a big evolution-creation controversy.
Science does not provide direct evidence for or against the existence of a divine creator. While science aims to explain the natural world through observable phenomena and mechanisms, the concept of a higher power designing the world falls under metaphysical or religious beliefs that are not within the scope of scientific inquiry. Ultimately, beliefs regarding whether or not God designed the world are personal and can vary based on individual perspectives.
G. J. Keane has written: 'Special creation rediscovered' -- subject(s): Bible and science, Christianity, Creation, Evolution, Religious aspects of Evolution 'Creation rediscovered'
It is called being religious (Christian, Muslim, Buddhist, etc according to which higher power you believe in) while, at the same time, accepting the facts of science. Many Christians, for example, do just that - believe in evolution.For more information about religion and evolution, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation