No, it would be unconstitutional
No. In a democracy the restriction of freedoms should never be an issue. If this happens, it will cease to be a democracy.
Here are a couple of example: My doctor suggested I should curtail my drinking. We had to curtail our plans to climb the mountain because of the snow storm. The police asked us to curtail the party because we were making too much noise.
It is true that insurance is able to curtail inflation, however, whether or not that means it should be made compulsory is a matter of personal opinion. Many economists believe it should be compulsory.
yes
If the federal government can perform an enumerated power without a law or action, then that law or action is unnecessary and therefore unconstitutional.
State's Rights is the political idea that state governments should have more power than the federal government, specifically the right to nullify a law they don't agree with or believe to be unconstitutional.
Unconstitutional, as its purpose is spiritual rather than secular
technically speaking, yes. if it isnt, it should be.
They believed in state's rights and with those rights they believed they should be able to determine the legality of slavery in their own state and they believed that Federal Government restriction of slavery in the territories was unconstitutional.
Henry Clay believed in states rights, meaning he thought states should decide if laws were unconstitutional or not and if they thought they were unconstitutional, they didn't have to obey them.
The act of attempting to restrict the access to guns is unconstitutional so it therefor should be banned.
If Social Security is a Constitutionally, Legal, Federal Government Program the answer is no. If Social Security is an unConstitutional, Federal Government Program the answer is still no. Money was taken from the workers wages by the Federal Government which promised to return the money at retirement, or in case of a debilitating injury. Legal or not legal, to take a mans money from him without his expressed permission is robbery. Workman's Compensation, by taking a workers Social Security wages, is guilty of theft if Social Security is Constitutional, or guilty of accessory to theft if Social Security is unConstitutional.