Yes, the simple answer is: There is no simple answer,
The complex answer: Read Manifest der kommunistischen Partei ("The Communist Manifesto"), Marx+Engels, 1848. Continue with history-books about implementing socialism in different contries, Be sure to read books representing both sides, Read MEW (Marx.Engels Werke) in fourtysomething binds in German. Especially Das Kapital is probably relevant for your question. Read some Lenin, cant really recommend a good book, Maybe the party programs of SED (Sozialistische Einheitspartei Deutsland), the former leading party in DDR (GDR) has some interesting points in their party programs. The SUKP (Soviet Union Kommunist Party) had a theoretical institute for scientific socialism. They issued books in many languages, probably including English. Issued under brands as Progres and Sputnik, ISBN 87-7334-........
Not an easy question, but I hope I have given you some inspiration for research,
/Lars
Correct, socialism is an economic and political system where the means of production, distribution, and exchange are owned or regulated by the community as a whole. The goal is to achieve a more equitable distribution of wealth and resources among members of society.
Land ownership in Latin America has historically been concentrated in the hands of a few wealthy elites, leading to social inequality and conflict. The unequal distribution of land has fueled social unrest and political movements advocating for land reform and redistribution. This issue continues to be a source of tension in many countries in the region.
when the poor became active in politics, this was to help better their lives. they came up with socialism. this did not work because the rich saw it as a threat to their fortunes, politicians saw it as a threat to public order, and Americans in general saw it as a threat to deeply rooted American private property, free enterprise, and individual liberty. Labor movements helped the poor people with the fight to gain money. They set up labor unions, some succeed while others did not. only certain labor groups helped certain people. They differ because socialism, everyone works together, they don't compete and with labor movements, there is a competition at every turn.
A French Socialist is a member of the Socialist Party in France or someone who follows socialist principles promoting social ownership and democratic control of the means of production for a more equal and fair society. The French Socialist Party has played a significant role in French politics, advocating for social welfare programs and progressive policies.
Primitive communalism refers to a social system where resources are shared equally among members of a community without private ownership. Communism, on the other hand, is a political and economic ideology advocating for a classless society where the means of production are owned collectively by the community. Communism is a more developed and complex form of societal organization compared to primitive communalism.
One of the best examples of a socialist nation today is Cuba. The country has a socialist system with state control of key industries and services, along with a focus on providing social welfare programs for its citizens.
This is one definition of "socialism." The social extension is called "communism" in that a classless society shares equally the responsibility and benefits of production.
Socialism is an economic system characterized by social ownership or control of the means of production and cooperative management of the economy, and a political philosophy advocating such a system.
Collective
That would be state capitalism, with the government owning the means of production. In Socialism, there is no exchange, and the whole community owns the means of production.
Capitalism allows for more freedom for businesses than socialism does
The Interstate Commerce act has nothing to do with socialism. Socialism has to do with ownership of the means of production and distribution, which means how the surplus value generated by the means of production is used. It is an example of government interventionism in a market-based economy. It did not attempt to change the method of ownership and allocation of surplus value in the railroad industry, nor did it attempt to introduce worker self-management.
Socialism
The purpose of socialism is to create a more equitable and just society by advocating for collective ownership and distribution of resources. It aims to address inequality and provide equal opportunities for all individuals, regardless of their socio-economic background. The ultimate goal is to diminish the influence of capitalism and empower the working class.
Socialism is an economic system in which goods and services are provided through a central system of cooperative and/or government ownership rather than through competition and a free market system. Refer to link below
Capitalism and Socialism can not be compared, because they are two complete different ideas that do nothing but conflict with each other.
If "socialism" is defined as public ownership of the means of production, then Norway, Singapore and Dubai would be examples of successful "state socialism" since they have many publicly-owned enterprises in their economies. If "socialism" is defined as co-operative ownership and mutual ownership of enterprise, then the economy of Spain during the Spanish Revolution and various co-operative enterprises operating in capitalist economies would be examples of successful socialism. If "socialism" means production for use, free distribution without the intermediary of money, then the open-source software movement would be an example of successful socialism, though a better description of this would be "communism".
Socialism--this is the dictionary definition of socialism. Particularly relevant right now, since it is the path we in the US are blindly blundering down as we nationalize banks and buy 60% interest in automakers using taxpayer money, but without the permission of the taxpayers or the administration even bothering to ask the congress. This path has always historically ended in economic collapse and the destruction of the civil society. --Steve Davis Denver, Colorado