Are you referring to the phrase... "en absentia?"
Yes, it is true that the defendant was present at the scene of the crime, Your Honor.
Here are the conjugates of the verb acquit: The court will acquit the defendant. (future) The court acquits the defendant. (present) The court acquitted the defendant. (past) The court has acquitted the defendant. (past participle) We've put them in sentences for you to make it easier to see them in action. Notice how in the present tense we add the "s" to the verb.
The term "defendant" is usually used to describe the accused in a criminal trial. Occasionally the term is loosely used in civil court cases where the defendant is more properly known as the "respondant."
Admonished to trial in absentia means that the court let the defendant know that if he didn't show up to the court date, he would be tried anyway. The court must tell the defendant to avoid violating his rights.
Yes a defendant can be held without bail at any time if the court deems the defendant to be a substantial flight risk or a danger to the community.
The King's daughter is present at the trail in ensure that there is a fair trail for the defendant.
The defendant is referred to as a "risk."
you are defendant of being a lierCorrection--The above is wrong and makes no sense --- "I call the defendant to the stand" (this is a term you would here in a court trial ----- Tigersy2k3
The term you're looking for is "nolo contendere." It is a Latin phrase meaning "I will not contest it," and it is used by a criminal defendant to accept the charges without admitting guilt. This plea allows the defendant to avoid a trial while still facing the consequences of the charges, similar to a guilty plea, but it cannot be used against them in future civil litigation.
Pleading no contest, or nolo contendere, is a legal term used in court when a defendant neither admits nor disputes a criminal charge. By entering a no contest plea, the defendant essentially accepts the punishment without admitting guilt. This plea cannot be used against the defendant in a civil case based on the same set of facts.
(1) The defendant made a false representation of a past or existing material fact susceptible of knowledge. (2) The defendant did so knowing the representation was false, or without knowing whether it was true or false. (3) The defendant intended to induce the plaintiff to act in reliance on that representation.
Illinois v. Allen :: 397 U.S. 337 (1970) It basically means a defendant has a right to be present during a trial, as per Constitutional rights, unless the defendant is disruptive. Then, the person can be removed and the trial go on without the person there.