False
absolute monarchy
Diocletian
Which revolution? They had an absolute monarchy, then a limited monarchy, then a Republic, then a Directorate, then a Consulate, then an Empire, then a limited monarchy, then the Empire again for three months, then the limited monarchy again, then an absolute monarchy, then a constitutional monarchy with a King from a different family, then a second Republic, then the Empire back again, then the Third Republic, then (during WW2) a puppet dictatorship, then a Fourth Republic, then a Fifth. Who knows if that's the end of the stoiry?
The Mughal Empire had an absolute monarchy. The Emperor was the supreme head of the State.
the empire of russia was a absolute monarchy
he used an Absolute Monarchy where the king queen or emperor has full control over the country
YES. While the strength of the centralization in the Inca Empire can be doubted, the de jure authority of the emperor cannot be; he was an absolute monarch.
An absolute monarchy, which was a parliamentary democracy for a relatively brief time during its history
Absolute Monarchy APEX
These incude:1800-1821: Overseas territory as part of the Spanish Empire (Viceroyalty of the New Spain)1821-1824: Absolute monarchy (First Mexican Empire)1824-1864: Federal republic (Federal Republic of the United Mexican States)1864-1867: Absolute monarchy (Second Mexican Empire)1867-1900: Federal Republic (United Mexican States)
The Persian Empire was an absolute monarchy. It was divided into 20 provinces (satrapies) each with a governor responsible to the king and his council for local and external security and tax collection. The tribal, city and petty kingdoms in the provinces continued to rule themselves according to their traditional ways.
he used an Absolute Monarchy where the king queen or emperor has full control over the country