Want this question answered?
yes
Had no standing army and no real power to enforce its decrees
The League of Nations, much like the UN, was a 'toothless dog' that all dictators and despots laughed at. Do you see the UN stopping mass killing in Syria, or Sudan or other places where innocent civilians are being decimated .
When Germany aggressively took over Poland and Japan showed aggression against the United States the war escalated. The US declared war against Germany. Oddly enough Germany also declared war against the United States on December 11, 1941. So Hitler's aggression was aimed at the US too.
Because they weren't sure they could win a war against the Italians, who had established ties with Germany. The Italian leader Mussolini dreamed of building a colonial empire in Africa like those of Britain and France, and had a formidable navy.
The League of Nations attempted to prevent German and Italian aggression through diplomatic negotiations, economic sanctions, and collective security measures. However, these efforts were not always successful in deterring the aggressive actions of these countries. Additionally, the League itself lacked the necessary enforcement mechanisms and the support of major powers to effectively curb the aggression of its member states.
WW2; the axis powers (Germany, Japan, and Italy).
The imperial ambitions of Germany worried those with trading ties to Europe, and Germany had targeted the shipping of neutral nations such as the US.
GERMANY
It was an attempt to guarantee the territorial integrity and political independence of member states against aggression.
No. They lost to Germany in the first full year of the war and the other Allied Nations had to liberate them.
Germany, Italy and Japan