The courts were responsible for enforcement
The Interstate Commerce Commission was to monitor railroad operations. The Sherman Antitrust Act was to break up bad trusts that were affecting the economy. But, it was ineffective because there was no definition as to what a trust or bad trust was. So it was later replaced witht eh Clayton Antitrust Act.
The Sherman Antitrust Act was weakened by its inability to properly define wording essential to proper enforcement. Words like conspiracy, combination, monopoly and trust were not clearly defined. There were also very narrow rulings on what constituted interstate trade and commerce.
I know the MLB is exempt, I'm not sure about any others (simply because it's America's past-time, stupid I know).
years of laissez-faire policies by the federal government.
The Sherman Antitrust Act was suppose to deal with large trust that held monopolies from various sections. The problem with the Sherman Antitrust Act was that it had actually used to attack unions. Unions fought the monopolies in order to gain more rights for the workers such as better living conditions, higher wages, 8 hour shifts, etc. The Sherman Act outlawed practices that are believed to be harmful to the consumers. Union strikes against railroads, coal, and other industries were stomped on because of this act. The monopolies convinced the American Government that the strikes imposed by the unions were "harmful" to the consumers. Therefore the Sherman Act was a double-edged sword that made the monopolies think more before they act (still the act didn't do that much) and it was used to bring down the unions that fought against the monopolies. The monopolies would be able to weaken unions; thus allowing them to reduce working conditions that allowed them to increase their profits.
Because they were good enough to break it
The Interstate Commerce Commission was to monitor railroad operations. The Sherman Antitrust Act was to break up bad trusts that were affecting the economy. But, it was ineffective because there was no definition as to what a trust or bad trust was. So it was later replaced witht eh Clayton Antitrust Act.
The Sherman Antitrust Act was weakened by its inability to properly define wording essential to proper enforcement. Words like conspiracy, combination, monopoly and trust were not clearly defined. There were also very narrow rulings on what constituted interstate trade and commerce.
the Northern Securities because they alarmed the Americans and Roosevelt. The stock battle that led to its creation seemed a classic example of private interests acting in a way that threatened the nation as a whole. Roosevelt decided that the company was in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act.
I know the MLB is exempt, I'm not sure about any others (simply because it's America's past-time, stupid I know).
years of laissez-faire policies by the federal government.
The Sherman Antitrust Act was suppose to deal with large trust that held monopolies from various sections. The problem with the Sherman Antitrust Act was that it had actually used to attack unions. Unions fought the monopolies in order to gain more rights for the workers such as better living conditions, higher wages, 8 hour shifts, etc. The Sherman Act outlawed practices that are believed to be harmful to the consumers. Union strikes against railroads, coal, and other industries were stomped on because of this act. The monopolies convinced the American Government that the strikes imposed by the unions were "harmful" to the consumers. Therefore the Sherman Act was a double-edged sword that made the monopolies think more before they act (still the act didn't do that much) and it was used to bring down the unions that fought against the monopolies. The monopolies would be able to weaken unions; thus allowing them to reduce working conditions that allowed them to increase their profits.
The Sherman Anti-Trust actBecause it was designed to prevent the formation and operation of monopolies, the ShermanAnti-Trust Act of 1890 is the legislation that was most closely related to the work of Ida Tarbell. The History of the Standard Oil Company was credited with contributing to the breakup of Standard Oil, which came about when the Supreme Court of the United States found the company to be violating the Sherman Antitrust Act.
Wonderful question! Tacticaly Grant because he changed the way the War Between the States was fought, but strategicaly Sherman because he changed the way future wars were fought. The nod goes to Sherman.
Because General Sherman marched to Savannah, GA.. which is near the sea.
Because the German's guns were superior and the Sherman had little armor.
You need to answer this question question because we don’t do homework and your teacher is looking for your critical thinking skills and how well you understood the lesson.