Land, Resources, and Religion. In my opinion wars are not fought for establishing a certain form of government, be it democracy or communism, or for the welfare of humanity at large. Democratic and communist governments have supported and aided countries which do not fall into either of these styles of government. Instead they have in the past installed rulers who are no more than puppets in the hands of the patron countries. Bottom line - if there is a buck to be made, a war will be waged.
The Clatsop, or Chinook, Indians were and are a group of Chinooken peoples living on the South side of the Columbia River. Traditional religion is complicated to explain as nothing was really "worshiped". Instead there were many customs to follow and taboos to avoid.
The convention that came to be known as the Constitutional Convention or the Federal Convention, meeting in Philadelphia, was instructed by the government under the Articles to revise the existing frame of government. Instead, the delegates decided to throw out the Articles of Confederation and write a new constitution for the nation.
The unitary system of government is in contrast to the federal system of government. It is characterized by the central government exercising the majority of powers, instead of delegating those responsibilities to lower levels of government. It is more efficient in smaller countries.
1915, Pancho had trusted on the Americans for support to keep the presidency of Mexico, but instead the U.S government recognized the new government of Venustiano Carranza.
atheism
The Puritans disapproved of all plays whether or not they were by Shakespeare. They disapproved of such forms of entertainment, recommending listening to sermons and reading the Bible instead.
ancient Egypt had a different religion and type of government. They also used hieroglyphics to write instead of Arabic. Modern Egypt has a president that is elected and not a living god pharaoh.
Othello promoted Cassio as his lieutenant instead of Iago.
the Establishment Clause prohibits the government from creating an official or established church, preferring one religion over another, or benefiting believers instead of nonbelievers
There was no real first psychologist. However, there was a man credited with separating psychological disturbances from religion or superstition and instead promoted a biological cause for these disturbances. This man was Hippocrates in fifth century B.C. He had classified mental disorders as a imbalance of bodily fluids.
The kind of religion that Martin Luther wanted instead of the Catholic Church was a more charismatic religion. This is what prompted the formation of the protestant movement.
A CFO promoted to CEO will ensure that the business runs profitably. A disadvantage is the fact that the CFO may only be focused on financial instead of helping their community.
Emerson was initially a Unitarian minister but later broke away from the Unitarian Church and rejected its reliance on dogma and traditional beliefs. He criticized the Unitarian religion for being stagnant and not conducive to personal growth and spiritual exploration. Instead, Emerson promoted a more individualistic and self-reliant approach to spirituality.
You probably mean "civil" religion. This is the (usually unacknowledged) "religion" or ethical system sanctioned by the government. It is what most people of the country agree to. In the U.S., "In God We Trust" is printed on our money, but the actual god is the country itself that people believe in generally. Basically, civil religion is the way the public wants to think of itself as being instead of acknowledging the realities of who and what they really are.
Technically, Seperation of Religion and State says that the government shall not endorse religion or religion in general. "In God We Trust" Is a phrase endorsing religion on a Federal bank note, so it could be lawfully considered Unconstitutional Government endorsing of Religious views. Of course, its easier to just remove the phrase instead of adding "In Allah we Trust,In God we dont trust, In The Supreme Being we trust",etc to neutralize what could be considered a religious endorsment. The US constitutionally must strive to be as neutral as possible in the matters of Religion.
A non-secular state is one that does not officially endorse or promote any specific religion or religious beliefs. Instead, it remains neutral in matters of religion and maintains a separation between government and religious institutions. This allows for freedom of religion and ensures that all individuals are treated equally regardless of their religious beliefs.