The US government openly stated that they would view any European interference in Latin America as?
Any European interference in Latin America would be viewed as a hostile act.
There are several political systems in Europe. This includes full monarchies, along with limited and constitutional monarchies. While some European countries are openly socialist, they do entail democratic based governments. Other European countries are also based on Parliamentary systems of government.
They wanted to work without interference from others and to be able to discuss the issues openly. Unlike today there was no "instant " news cycle or modern technology and they were able to accomplish the task. One important thing as well there were no political parties that they were held to. Yes, they did have views on how a government should be made, but they were able to compromise to create this document that…
Government relations are very tricky. Politics are corrupt everywhere, but that plot was not American born. Terrorists openly and proudly hate America and Christianity. They were targeting areas they knew would get a lot of attention. They interrupted the stock market to hurt our economy. A lot of training was needed to execute that plan, and who knows what the full potential was.
If by "our" government you mean America there are many observation that lead one to think America is a theocracy. Although theocracies are usually seen to be present in Moslem countries and in the Vatican, the USA has many attributes of a theocracy: It calls itself a Christian country based on the Bible Christian vales are maintained for many social interactions Prejudices against other religions is technically frowned on but is tolerated Religious practices (Swearing…
There are roughly 300,000 Christians in Iran. While they have "official government protection" several major Iranian laws are skewed against Christians such as requiring that Christian schools are run by Muslims, that no Christian can have a senior government post, and that no Christian can openly proselytize or eat pork or wine in public.
There are many reasons, but the principal one may be that a self-governing people who elect their government officials must be free to discuss political matters openly and robustly in order to make good decisions about government. This includes the ability to criticize the government when it makes mistakes or violates the Constitution or other laws. Unfettered discussion is one of the best ways to arrive at truth.