If I'm not mistaken, it was Montesquieu who argued that a republic could survive only in a small territory.
The argument was the words of President who ordered the bombs. He stated that he wanted to end the war and to collapse the means for Japan to make war ever again. There were other facts as to why to drop the bomb but wanting to end the war fell in the first place.
the republic of Kora
he liked eating sh*t like you stated your mom
President James K. Polk.
He was a strict constructionist and since the Constitution never explicitly stated that the President had the authority to purchase land, he was conflicted between his views and the incredible opportunity to purchase the entire Louisiana Territory from the French for a mere $15 million. Obviously he ended up making the purchase but his belief in explicit interpretation of the Constitution was what made him unsure.
France.
stated claim
Iraq is a form of republic, similar to Britain's. This is stated in the name, The Republic of Iraq.
A Democratic Republic
Two arguments about a historical event contradict each other. How should historians determine which argument is superior?
A stated case can be compared to one side of a debate. The stated case can be a pro reason something is done or a anti reason something is done. It is essentially one side of an argument.
Yes, there is a thesis statement in an argument. The thesis is usually stated in your intro only; the rest of the essay is just body paragraphs to prove your logic
Two arguments about a historical event contradict each other. How should historians determine which argument is superior?
The Northwest ordinance of 1787
Thomas Jefferson
freeport doctrine
A rebuttal is an argument against another's stated position. It is used in courtrooms to create doubt about the innocence or guilt of the accused.