answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

the dred scott decision stated that slaves are peoplealso and should'nt be property :D yurwelcomee<3

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: The dred Scott decision stated that slaves?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What was stated in the dred scott decision?

Slaves were the property of their owners.


What document states that slaves were not citizens?

The Dred Scott v. Sandford Supreme Court decision in 1857 is the document that stated that slaves were not citizens and had no legal rights.


What decision declared that slaves could not be taken from their masters?

The Dred Scott decision


What document states that slaves are not citizens?

The dred scott decision


Why did the Dred Scott decision alarm Northerners?

The Dred Scott decision declared the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional and ruled that slaves were property. The decision did not necessarily alarm most people in the North.


What was John C Breckinridge platform?

He stood for the Dred Scott Decision (for slaves).


What did the Dred Scott Decision say about the condition of slaves in the?

we should all be the same


How did the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendment affect the Dred Scott decision?

The Dred Scott decision stated that people of African decent imported to America were not citizens and not protected by the Constitution. The fourteenth and fifteenth amendments nullified that decision.


What was one of the findings of the Supreme Court in the Dred Scott decision Slaves were citizens. Slaves were property. Slavery was illegal. Slavery was a choice each state could make.?

One of the findings of the Supreme Court in the Dred Scott decision was that slaves were considered property, not citizens.


Who supported the Dred Scott decision?

the south because the case said that slaves were definitly not citizens


How did the northerners and southerners react to the Dred Scott decision?

Southerners were delighted with the Dred Scott decision, but northerners were outraged.


Why were people outraged at the Supreme Court's decision in the Dred Scott case?

The court stated that Scott was property therefore his owner could move him to any location and he was still property. The fact that the court found slaves as property was a decision that changed the status of slaves. They were no longer human, but the same as a table or horse.