0
The scientist Wegener's time should have accepted his hypothesis?
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Yes, because he is the only scientist that discovered the CONTINENTAL DRIFT and studied all about FEATURES,FOSSILS AND EVIDENCE OF CLIMATE CHANGE when 1900.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is wegeners phypothesis about earths continents have moved?
Can't log on .... but essentially I believe you are speaking of 'Plate Tectonics'. I'm sure Wikipedia should have a relatively comprehensive but understandable explanation.
Who is considered to be the first modern scientist and why does he deserve that honor?
Grosseteste, because he taught that a scientist should make observations and then come up with a tentative explanation for why the observed events happened. WRONG grosseteste was known as "the father of the science method" he was not the first modern scientist.
Why are new ideas often rejected and what is needed before new ideas should be accepted?
you should think about the idea and answeer it and some it up for a new idea
What three things make a good hypothesis?
"Good science" should be based on the scientific method. The Scientific method is based on gathering observable, empirical and measurable evidence.
What is altitude in geography?
Altitude refers to how high or tall something is, like a mountain. It should really be elevation that we use but altitude has become the accepted norm now, but both are interchangeable.
The scientists of wegeners time should have accepted his hypothesis why or why not?
yes because they didnt know how wegners inteligence was and they should have tried it in the firts place anyway it would have helped relize that his hypothesis waas correct when they dobt of him!
The scientists of wegeners time should have accepted his hypothesis .why or why not?
yes because they didnt know how wegners inteligence was and they should have tried it in the firts place anyway it would have helped relize that his hypothesis waas correct when they dobt of him!
The scientist of wegeners should have rejected his idea?
no because then they would know least about the world
What should a scientist do if a hypothesis is not supported?
If I was the scientist you would test is as soon as possible then just skip the hypothesis step
What should a scientist do if a hypothesis is supported?
If I was the scientist you would test is as soon as possible then just skip the hypothesis step
What should be done after data is collected for an experiment?
The scientist or student scientist should review the results. Conclusions should be drawn based on the results. Then, the hypothesis is reviewed to make sure the results confirm the hypothesis; if not, revise the hypothesis and rerun the experiment.
As a scientist what should you do after concluding that your tests support your hypothesis?
The experiment that you will design is done to test the hypothesis.
What do scientist do when experiments show their hypothesis is incorrect?
If an experiment does not confirm his hypothesis, the scientist should report this honestly. Even if the results confirmed the hypothesis, further testing should be done by him or others to gather more data.
Why is A hypothesis important?
putting a certain hypothesis is important for the person making a certain experiment.For exampe,if s/he were a scientist,the hypothesis would help in knowing what experiments should be done(in another words,NO hypothesis-->NO experiments will be done).
Why is formulating a hypothesis important?
putting a certain hypothesis is important for the person making a certain experiment.For exampe,if s/he were a scientist,the hypothesis would help in knowing what experiments should be done(in another words,NO hypothesis-->NO experiments will be done).
When the evidence in a scientific experiment does not support the hypothesis what should the scientist do?
When the evidence in a scientific experiment does not support the hypothesis the scientist:Confirm through repeated experimentation that the evidence is validReject the hypothesisDevelop another hypothesis that is consistent with the valid evidence
The scientists of wegener's time should have accepted his hypothesis Why or why not?
yes because they didnt know how wegners inteligence was and they should have tried it in the firts place anyway it would have helped relize that his hypothesis waas correct when they dobt of him!
