Those of royal birth have absolute authority to rule.
Modern democracies were developed to challenged the idea that any Royal family was in charge of everyone in the world.
Greece began by having monarchies, then oligarchies, then tyrannies and then democracies. The Greek Government is currently a democracy, but modern democracy finds it's roots in ancient Greece.
That is a matter of opinion. Enlightenment thinking is responsible for the way that modern democracies function, industrialization is responsible for the way the economy in those democracies (and in other 'modern' countries) functions. You could however argue that the form of industrialization that the industrial revolution started is already changing under the influence and possibilities of today's digital age; but that the democratic form of government that is a result of Enlightenment thinking still endures and will continue to do so for a considerable time. So it's debatable which of the two is more 'significant'; Enlightenment is at least more enduring.
Independence of Judiciary means that it is not under the control of the legislature or the executive. the judges do not act on the direction of the government or according to the wishes of the party in power. That is why all modern democracies have courts that are independent of the legislature and the executive.
If current Tunisia continues to behave the way it did in the previous election by the time the next election comes, the Arab World will have added "Modern Functional Democracy" to its list of various regime types. However, up to the present day there are no Arab States that are Liberal Democracies. There are numerous Illiberal Democracies in the Arab World, though. In those cases, the Arab Nations were Liberal Democracies on paper with guaranteed voting rights, freedoms of speech and religion, constitutions that bind the authority of the Executive. However, in nearly every Arab regime that this describes (like Saddam Hussein's Iraq, Mubarak's Egypt, ben Ali's Tunisia) these paper rights and limitations did not exist. These rulers used an apparent mechanism of democracy to perpetuate a dictatorship.
In those Greek city-states with direct democracies, they were small enough for the citizens to walk to fortnightly assemblies where they deciided on all issues and the council carried them out between meetings. That worked for a small population and area. Modern countries are much larger and more populous so this just wouldn't work (even Singapore couldn't do it - Monaco could). So we have representative democracies where a few people are elected to a parliament to represent the people. The problem is that they end up representing their own interests and political parties, not their electors, which is causing the decline in modern democracy.
The theory underlying Êmodern or current democracies was Êestablished to challenge the idea that those of royal birth have total authority to rule. Modern democracies countries Êallow Êeligible citizens to elect their leaders.
It is impractical for all members of large societies to vote on all matters.
Answer this question… A. In modern representative democracies, all citizens have the obligation to craft laws and the responsibility to follow those laws. B. Certain citizens of modern representative democracies are obligated to craft laws, while the rest of the citizens are obligated to follow those laws. C. All citizens of modern representative democracies have the right to vote and craft laws, but not all citizens are obligated to follow those laws. D. In modern representative democracies, citizens have the right to run for office in order to craft laws and the responsibility to follow those laws.
In modern democracies, the people's will is (in theory) sovereign.
The duration of The Challenge... A Tribute to Modern Art is 1.73 hours.
The Challenge... A Tribute to Modern Art was created on 1974-12-05.
The Atheians had direct democracy - the citizens met in fortnightly assembly and voted on issues. Modern democracies are representative democracies - citizens elect members to vote on their behalf in a parliament. Both have their strengths and weaknesses, but the size of most modern democracies prohibits citizens attending regular meetings.
You do not challenge Infinity Ward
inter changable parts
interchangable parts -S
RICHARD MULGAN has written: 'HOLDING POWER TO ACCOUNT: ACCOUNTABILITY IN MODERN DEMOCRACIES'
No, sorry.