answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The state of nature that was feared by Thomas Hobbes, would be the "war of all against all," and life for Hobbes seemed "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short." Under these conditions a strong state was needed to protect people from other people. (Mitchell, Roots of Wisdom)

It refers to the time in history when man will live without governments and laws.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

6d ago

Thomas Hobbes's state of nature refers to the hypothetical pre-social condition of humanity, where individuals exist in a state of total freedom but also face constant conflict due to the absence of a governing authority. In this state, life is described as "nasty, brutish, and short," with individuals driven by self-interest and a struggle for survival. Hobbes argued that to escape this state, individuals must come together to form a social contract and establish a sovereign power to maintain peace and order.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Thomas Hobbe's state of nature refers to?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Philosophy

How did thomas hobbes view human nature?

Thomas Hobbes believed that human nature was inherently selfish and driven by a desire for power and self-preservation. He argued that in a state of nature, without a governing authority, individuals would be in a constant state of conflict with one another.


Which philosopher believes the state of nature is a warof all against all?

Thomas Hobbes believed that the state of nature is a "war of all against all" in which life is "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short." He argued that in this state, individuals act out of self-interest and competition for resources, leading to conflict and insecurity.


What was Thomas Hobbes's view of human nature?

Thomas Hobbes believed that human nature is inherently selfish and driven by a desire for power and self-preservation. He argued that without strong government control, humans would live in a state of perpetual conflict and chaos.


What is Thomas Hobbes original state of nature?

Thomas Hobbes's original state of nature is a hypothetical condition before the creation of societies, where individuals were in a state of constant conflict and competition for resources. In this state, life was described as "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short," leading individuals to pursue self-interest and ultimately creating a chaotic and dangerous environment.


Describes a major difference between the Enlightenment thinkers Thomas Hobbes and John Locke?

One major difference between Hobbes and Locke is their views on the state of nature. Hobbes believed that the state of nature was a state of war and chaos, where life was solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short. In contrast, Locke believed that the state of nature was characterized by peace, equality, and natural rights, such as life, liberty, and property.

Related questions

According to Thomas Hobbes in the state of nature every person had complete?

According to Thomas Hobbes, in the state of nature every person had complete liberty. He proposed that the pure state of nature is the natural condition of mankind.


Thomas Hobbes argued that life in the state of nature is?

"solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short." Hobbes believed that without a central authority to enforce laws and maintain order, human life would be characterized by constant conflict and violence. This is why he advocated for a strong and centralized government to prevent chaos and protect individuals' rights.


Which philosopher believes the state of nature is a war of all against all?

Thomas Hobbes.


Which philosopher believes the state of nature is a warof all against all?

Thomas Hobbes believed that the state of nature is a "war of all against all" in which life is "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short." He argued that in this state, individuals act out of self-interest and competition for resources, leading to conflict and insecurity.


Compare and contrast state of nature according Hobbes and rousseu?

According to Thomas Hobbes, the state of nature or life would be worthless if not protected by the state, while according to Jean-Jacques Rousseau, the state of nature involves men driving towards self-preservation.


Which of he following statements is about thomas hobbes and john Locke is not correct?

"Thomas Hobbes believed that people are inherently good and can be trusted, while John Locke believed in the concept of the social contract and the idea of natural rights." This statement is incorrect because it switches the beliefs of Hobbes and Locke. Hobbes actually believed in the inherent selfishness and competitiveness of human nature, while Locke emphasized the importance of natural rights and the consent of the governed in a social contract.


How does Thomas Hobbes theory of the state of nature relates to the movie Thelma and Louise?

Do the coursework lazy.


In what ways does the international system resemble Thomas Hobbes's view of the state of nature?

strong nations....


Who said that the purpose of the state is to control the evil nature of man and compel him to act morally?

Thomas Hobbes


What man wrote this in a state of nature no government existed and life was cruel brutish and short?

Thomas Hobbes


Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes?

Thomas Hobbes was a 17th-century philosopher known for his work on political theory and social contract. He believed that humans are inherently self-interested and in a constant state of competition. Hobbes argued for a powerful central authority to maintain order and prevent conflict, as seen in his most famous work, Leviathan.


Thomas Hobbes views the social contract primarily as a means of?

preserving order and escaping the brutal state of nature